We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
React sooner versus Fixing for longer
stoke_bishop
Posts: 70 Forumite
I think I'm getting there in honing my question. I'm sorry for dragging this out and to anyone that I've offended!
One of the things that appeals to me about a 3 is the possibility of reacting post-election, post credit crunch and sooner than if I go for five years when rates may be really sky high by then. Three things:
(a) Is the a valid viewpoint?
(b) Should I stick my finger in the air?
(c) Should I get my coat?
Thanks in advance...
One of the things that appeals to me about a 3 is the possibility of reacting post-election, post credit crunch and sooner than if I go for five years when rates may be really sky high by then. Three things:
(a) Is the a valid viewpoint?
(b) Should I stick my finger in the air?
(c) Should I get my coat?
Thanks in advance...
0
Comments
-
I think you should just go for the 3 year as that's what you seem to be talking yourself into, and stop trying to read the future! No-one knows when the credit crunch will end, who will win the election, and what will happen to inflation/house prices/interest rates.
Personally as I mentioned on thread 2. I think you should go for the 5 year and overpay if rates go up, but I think you just have to make a decision now.
Don't take this the wrong way but you're reminding me of someone I knew who kept a scrapbook with every single computer on offer, deliberating for ages, and when he finally made the decision they were all out of date!0 -
stoke_bishop wrote: »I think I'm getting there in honing my question. I'm sorry for dragging this out and to anyone that I've offended!
One of the things that appeals to me about a 3 is the possibility of reacting post-election, post credit crunch and sooner than if I go for five years when rates may be really sky high by then. Three things:
(a) Is the a valid viewpoint?
(b) Should I stick my finger in the air?
(c) Should I get my coat?
Thanks in advance...
(d) buy a bullet proof vest?
When I said be more specific in the questions you ask your IFA I didn't think that meant the forum. You could continue with the same thread, questions grow and change - part of thread life. It's darn confusing jumping from one thread to another.
So I repeat (hopefully for last time) - It's your decison and only yours. Affordability or flexibility?
Failing that flip a coin0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards