We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
First Direct's refusal to do Consent to Let
stoke_bishop
Posts: 70 Forumite
Hey,
Do you think that if in a few years' time I need to let my house out cos I have to move away (always a possibility) that FD would allow me to do eventhough when I speak with them now they tell me it would not be possible. Would they actually show some understanding do you think? Or if I'm bothered about CtL, should I just avoid them.
Thanks in advance...
Do you think that if in a few years' time I need to let my house out cos I have to move away (always a possibility) that FD would allow me to do eventhough when I speak with them now they tell me it would not be possible. Would they actually show some understanding do you think? Or if I'm bothered about CtL, should I just avoid them.
Thanks in advance...
0
Comments
-
Well if they told you that they wouldn't then I would not make any plans on the basis that they may change their minds in the future0
-
Indeed. I used to live in Stoke Bishop, by the way (as a student in hall).
Perhaps FD do not allow their mortgage borrowers to let, as a matter of policy. It would be mad to take a mortgage from a lender with that attitude if you think it's probable or even possible you'll have to let.0 -
MarkyMarkD wrote: »Indeed. I used to live in Stoke Bishop, by the way (as a student in hall).
Perhaps FD do not allow their mortgage borrowers to let, as a matter of policy. It would be mad to take a mortgage from a lender with that attitude if you think it's probable or even possible you'll have to let.
Thanks for that.
I was a student here as well, just ended up staying in Bristol!0 -
You'd probably have to change your mortgage from owner occupied to buy to let to do this.0
-
That's not true, for quite a number of lenders, mpsavuk. That's why it's important for the OP to choose a lender which allows letting on their residential products in the first place.
I also stayed in Bristol after university, but only for 8 years and now I am elsewhere.
0 -
First Direct have always cherry picked business. It doesnt matter what area. If you fit their criteria they are often good value. If you go off their criteria they dont really want to know most of the time. Based on their track record, I wouldnt enter a major contract like this knowing that an option you may need is not currently available as chances are it will never be available.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards