We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

buying parents property

Hi , please could anyone offer general advice. My husband , his brother and sister gave their parents money to buy their council house about 4 years ago. Last year their mum went to a solicitors and put the house in their name. They live in the house rent free but pay for maintenance. We have done this naively and now are wondering what will happen when they pass away. Will we have a big bill or should we have done things differently. We thought it would be an investment for our children. Thanks in anticipation for any advice.
«1

Comments

  • MarkyMarkD
    MarkyMarkD Posts: 9,912 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If they have just got an ex-council house and not many other assets, probably no problem.
  • Since she remains in the house at no cost you are right to be concerned.
    If the house value + the value of any other of her assets total signifcantly more than £263,000 you could have to pay Inheritance tax.
    If you were to say what the house is now worth with vacant possession, roughly, and hopw old you parents are and other relevent facts I might say more.
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
  • this is a tricky one ??? - it appears on the surface that the house does not belong to the parents at all as they now have signed it over to the children who paid for it... however the house can still be considered an assett on death as it is a gift given before death that they still gained some benefit from (ie they live in it) the value of the house can also be added to any Inheritance tax calculation if it is considered as a gift given within 7 years of passing away :( it is impossible to say without knowing the parents income but you could assume that they did not have the money themselves as the children paid for it for them (although this was an investment) even if this is the case the increase in property prices and the discount they will have received would more than cover any tax that was possibly due
    I have had brain surgery - sorry if I am a little confused sometimes ;)
  • diann_2
    diann_2 Posts: 13 Forumite
    There is no big money involved. We bought the house for 15,000, paying 5,000 per child. The parents have no money themselves and are mid 60's and retired. Houses in the same street are fetching 110,000. It's quite a nice street and they do sell well.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There won't be any inheritance tax liability because the allowance is £263K (and it doesn't sound like they have loads of other assets tucked away).

    Did you pay a fair market price at the time (doesn't sound like it).
    If not then it could be construed as a gift by the local authorities (as you didn't pay a fair price for it) and they could potentially sell the house or put charges against the house (to be paid when it's sold) if either of them need long term care.

    There is lots of information available about this subject on the age concern website, but basically they are not allowed to give their money away and then claim state benefits i.e. long term care. There is no time limit for this.
  • We still do not know how old the parents are.
    ...............................I have put my clock back....... Kcolc ym
  • diann_2
    diann_2 Posts: 13 Forumite
    dad 66, mum 64
  • The DSS will usually only contest the signing over of a property if it is deemed that is has been done solely to enable the original owner to claim state benefits.
    I have had brain surgery - sorry if I am a little confused sometimes ;)
  • diann_2
    diann_2 Posts: 13 Forumite
    The parents don't claim benefits as they have a superann pension. The house was only really signed over because there are other siblings who did not want to contribute to the purchase and as the house was in the parents name we thought would have a claim to it.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The DSS will usually only contest the signing over of a property if it is deemed that is has been done solely to enable the original owner to claim state benefits.

    And do you think they wouldn't deem this?
    if so why?
    (I agree that the parents age is relevant).
    The house was only really signed over because there are other siblings who did not want to contribute to the purchase and as the house was in the parents name we thought would have a claim to it.

    I am not questioning your reasons.
    I am sure you didn't do it to claim benefits.
    However you have to consider how a local authority aying £20K a year or more might view it.
    You might be safe because your parents are young, but there are not guarantees as there are no time limits.
    I have seen a case going back 18 years.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.