We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HELP! - Re: The 6 year rule....
Options
Comments
-
hi bear and tina
this has been an amazing thread and i have learned so much from it.
i hope you get it all sorted bear let us know what happensLight Bulb Moment 1st January '06-£82,000 :idea:
Debt 6th August '06 -£91,500 :eek:
Bankrupt 7th August '06
BCSC Member 17:T0 -
Its all getting like an episode of Eastenders now.
Ok as previously stated Scotcall sent me a letter which I received on the 13th Jan, letter dated 10th, which threatened me with a visit within 7 days and if I wanted to write to them it had to be with in 7days, so I sent a letter recorded on the 16th which they received on 18th Jan.
So all tickety then I recieve a letter today, which was dated the 18th which reads as follows:
Dear Customer (a tad impersonal me thinks!!)
Please find enclosed payment returned to you (this was the £1 I sent for them to provide me with a statement etc), as we are no longer dealing with your account.
The creditor, to whom you owe this debt, will contact you shortly.
Your faithfully etc etc
Well I find this all a tad odd, would they be acting this way if id sent them a cheque for the outstanding account, also regarding the line that the "creditor to whom I owe the debt will be in contact" is this the original bank, if so I dont see how they can be seeing as they've sold the debt on.
Your thoughts, ideas etc on this matter would be most appreciated.
Thanks for now
The BearLive each day like its your last because one day you'll be right0 -
looks like a job for Mulder & Scully!
...Linda xxIt's easy to give in to that negative voice that chants "cant do it" BUT we lift each other up.
We dont count all the runners ahead of us & feel intimidated.
Instead we look back proudly at our journey, our personal struggle & determination & remember that there are those that never even attempt to reach the starting line.0 -
When a debt is sold on there are various conditions to the sale, mainly that it is legit and enforcable. It sounds like scotcall have realised it is not and has sent it back to the original creditor.
Regards
XXbigman's guide to a happy life.
Eat properly
Sleep properly
Save some money0 -
The creditor, to whom you owe this debt
.. is the one you send the demand and £1 to. Not the debt collector.0 -
Well its been a while and all quiet on the western front until today, Ive just received this letter from J2Solutions, Blackburn
The Occupier
Address
etc etc
Re Phatbear:
I am attempting to contact the above named person or any member of his/her family about a personal matter.
If you are the person named above or have any information regarding the whereabouts of this person please telephone me in confidence on the number above upon receipt of this letter.
Any information you are able to give will be treated with the utmost confidence and your assistance will be greatly appreciated.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
My personal thought was to get my good lady, whos house they have sent this too, to write back asking why they need to get hold of me, because unless they tell her why they need to contact me she wont pass my details on, and of course if they come through with the details of any debt then I'll jump all over them for going against data protection.
Your thoughts theories on this matter as ever would be appreciated.
One last thing I had a quick search and I cant find this company on google/bt etc and Im waiting to go to work this afternoon to check with companies house. Tad odd me thinks.
Anyway all the best for now
The BearLive each day like its your last because one day you'll be right0 -
I receieved a similair letter about a family member. I wrote to them asking why and they stated that they were unable to tell me because of data protection act.
Had a word with B-I-L he called them and it was Barclays Bank or Card . He asked them to prove the debt was his and he has heard nothing.
I think the letters are quiet crafty .
B-I-L came across this article when trying to find out who they were.
http://www.ukdebtadvisers.co.uk/forum/index.html?/gentools/discuss/messages/2849.html.
http://www.ukdebtadvisers.co.uk/forum/ he then searched for j2 solutions. B-I-L is adamant that he has never had any dealings with Barclays .His credit files show nothing. I think you should procede with caution.0 -
Thanks for the heads up rubyru, they sound like an interesting company to deal with, so let battle commence.
All the best
The BearLive each day like its your last because one day you'll be right0 -
After 6 years it becomes statute barred so long as there's no contact. Make a Consumer Credit Act 1974 request for the original credit agreement. I'm doing this to 30 DCA's simultaneously. After 30 days of them not being able to send me everything I need, the debt becomes unenforceable and they can't do squat. They also break the law by not doing it. OK it costs £1 per company, but well worth it, if only for the amusement of throwing them all in to a blind panic seeing 30 companies scramble for just 3 documents at the same time.
The grip is, they have to supply the documents whether they are the original creditor or not.
Little do they all know it's a first stage in reclaiming charges from all 30 of themSweet, sweet justice.
Avoid paying debt if you can get out of it on a technicality, ignore the moral-high-horse-brigade. By the sounds of it there's some DCA workers in there, I get suspicious of people saying you should pay back debt blindly. DCA's are hardly moral, why should you be and why should you care? Play them at their own game. They set the rules, it's poetic to use them in your favour
Good luck!0 -
phatbear wrote:Its all getting like an episode of Eastenders now.
Ok as previously stated Scotcall sent me a letter which I received on the 13th Jan, letter dated 10th, which threatened me with a visit within 7 days and if I wanted to write to them it had to be with in 7days, so I sent a letter recorded on the 16th which they received on 18th Jan.
So all tickety then I recieve a letter today, which was dated the 18th which reads as follows:
Dear Customer (a tad impersonal me thinks!!)
Please find enclosed payment returned to you (this was the £1 I sent for them to provide me with a statement etc), as we are no longer dealing with your account.
The creditor, to whom you owe this debt, will contact you shortly.
Your faithfully etc etc
Well I find this all a tad odd, would they be acting this way if id sent them a cheque for the outstanding account, also regarding the line that the "creditor to whom I owe the debt will be in contact" is this the original bank, if so I dont see how they can be seeing as they've sold the debt on.
Your thoughts, ideas etc on this matter would be most appreciated.
Thanks for now
The Bear
Don't worry, in 30 days they are breaking the law by not sending you the things you request. But to be honest it sounds like your letter was too lame for them to take seriously. Send the £1 back with a letter indicating the current deadline before you start legal action or make a complaint or something.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards