We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

advice re company pension

a friend works in a company where they work weekend overtime.
on the weekend the staff receive pay at time and a half and a premium.
the staff were under the impression overtime was counted when determining their pension. my friend who is retiring soon thought their pension forecast was wrong because it did not include overtime but they were advised the rules had changed and only the premium was taken into account when calculating pension. the premium is tiny in comparison to time and half pay.
can the trustees change the rules like this? does my friend have any means of redress? do they just accept it?
thanks

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You would need to clarify if its an occupational pension scheme or a group personal pension.

    From what you have typed so far, it looks like a group personal pension or a money purchase occupational scheme. The fact you mentioned "premium" suggests that.

    There are so many things that could have happened that it would be difficult to answer without facts. However, yes, the trustees/employer can make changes to the scheme but would notify on changes that effect contributions.

    Money purchase schemes are just like any saving scheme. If you dont put much in, you dont get much out. An employer can have a very good money purchase scheme but it still doesnt mean that by itself, it is enough to give a decent income in retirement.

    I doubt there is any redress. However, without the facts needed, who knows?
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.