We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ltd Company Director SIPP Contributions

2»

Comments

  • ali_bear
    ali_bear Posts: 598 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Just as an aside to all of the good advice already given. If you pay too much into your pensions you will just end up paying higher rate tax on it after retirement. Exactly how big a DC fund has to be for this depends on retirement age, investment growth, the tax rates and thresholds applying then, etc.

    A little FIRE lights the cigar
  • BethBC
    BethBC Posts: 7 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker

    Thanks for taking the time to respond and flag these issues with me. I think the package is comparable, yes. As for the shareholding issue, that's just sat in the too difficult pile - I set up the business 25 years ago…this is a second marriage 10 years ago and my son (not his son) has just joined the business with a view to longer term succession planning and so shares will probably, ultimately go his way and I haven't been able to clearly assess the pros and cons of giving shares to my husband!

  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 15,880 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Don't forget that you can have more than one class of share, giving you flexibility in terms of both dividends payable and voting rights. It's not difficult to do, but the fact this is still in your 'too difficult' pile (we all have one of those!) suggests that this has perhaps not been considered?

    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 2,730 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    This is where a Chartered Accountant with a wealth of family business succession and corporate fiscal planning experience would be an asset here.

    The fact you are asking questions on pensions here that a decent accountant should be able to help you navigate together with an IFA, suggests you and your business may have outgrown the competencies of your present accountancy firm. Would this be an accruate statement?

    Certainly your circumstances seem fairly typical of the kind of scenario my old firm ( at partner level) used to address with private company owners and their families.

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 20,551 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    HMRC can be cautious when it comes to "alphabet shares" and their attention may be drawn to check the details of the arrangement as being genuine and not simply tax avoidance

  • BethBC
    BethBC Posts: 7 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Combo Breaker

    Yes, that would be a very accurate statement! I would describe them more as a bookkeeper. It's only really been the last 3 or 4 years that excess profits and being able to pay large SIPP contributions has been a feature! If you have any recommendations for a suitable professional adviser on the Herts/Essex border, I would be grateful.

  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 15,880 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    HMRC can be cautious when it comes to "alphabet shares" and their attention may be drawn to check the details of the arrangement as being genuine and not simply tax avoidance

    Indeed and that's the sort of response you get if you google on the point. But as OP's husband is working full time in the business, the reality is that in this case it's unlikely to create an issue, especially if (as sounds likely) OP will be seeking more sophisticated accounting advice than they have at present.

    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 2,730 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    Best I can do is point you in the direction of the ICAEW and their directory of practitioners below -

    https://www.icaew.com/

    Can I also suggest you expand your search to include London Chartered Accountancy firms (who may have regional branch offices), where there is a greater concentration of firms with the competencies I identified.

    Your final choice of firm, should also be able to link you up with ancillary legal practitioners they work with, assuming you have similarly outgrown your solicitor.

  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 2,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    I don't think people are allowed to make recommendations on here.

    If you belong to a local business people organisation then maybe people there would have some names for you. And perhaps some warnings of who to avoid.

    Otherwise (and granted it may be a tricky conversation) you could try asking your book-keeper. They are likely to have a handle on the local competition and you could put it in terms of tax planning/corporate succession planning which they may admit is not their thing but could steer you towards the sort of outfit you require.

  • Dead_keen
    Dead_keen Posts: 342 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    I think it depends what you mean by alphabet shares.

    1. No dividend rights on one class of shares - absolutely fine, fill your boots.
    2. No entitlement to a dividend unless the directors want to pay you a bonus - bang to rights.
    3. Some entitlement to dividends but it can change depending on various factors that may or may not be based on the personal characteristics of the shareholder or the part of the business they work in - hmmm.

    Historically, HMRC has taken little interest in different shares in a company with different dividend rights. It manual's are clear that the extreme version of (google it) "Alphabet Soup" creates a double tax charge.

    Will HMRC take a different view going forward? They have not told me so I will have to guess. And my guess is that HMRC will start to focus on it as (i) HMRC will soon get a whole heap of extra dividend data for smaller companies (**), and (ii) it is trivial to analyse that data and look for "interesting" patterns.

    ** for the geeky, have a look at reg 5 SI 2025/84

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.