We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Continue contributing to pension or something else?

2»

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,163 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Sounds like using your wife's £60k allowance and carry forward is available. (subject to company profits).

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • noitsnotme
    noitsnotme Posts: 1,582 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    If I divert my contributions to her so she contributes double (and me nothing) it would still be less than £60k.

    The question was really about is that more sensible than continuing to contribute to mine. Or is there another option entirely.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,163 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    If you are not utilising your wife's allowance and she is nowhere near the £1m, then using hers instead of yours is the logical option.

    You get reduced benefit as you will be exceeding the LSA. Your wife is nowhere near it.

    The investment risk differences are a discussion between you and your wife, and whether you have independent finances or linked finances. If your finances are linked and you don't care whose name the money is in (which is the most common scenario) then you need to adapt your risk profiles to take a "joint" view rather than an individual view.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 2,806 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Have you and your wife been maxing out your contributions to ISAs? It may not be as tax efficient as pension contributions but it can give you both some flexibility.

  • noitsnotme
    noitsnotme Posts: 1,582 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    We have some funds in ISAs (low 6 figure sum) but not been maxing them out, preferring the tax efficiency of employer pension contributions to get the funds out of the business.

    We don’t draw much in wages from the company as we have fairly decent rental income from the two properties.

  • noitsnotme
    noitsnotme Posts: 1,582 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    It is logical isn’t it. I probably should have considered it sooner. Dropped the ball on that one really.

    Our finances are very much linked and we certainly should revisit her risk profile if we’re going to divert all contributions to her pension.

    I take it there are no issues with the company contributing a fairly large sum to her pension and none to mine? As mentioned, we are both directors with a 50/50 shareholding.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,163 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    I take it there are no issues with the company contributing a fairly large sum to her pension and none to mine? As mentioned, we are both directors with a 50/50 shareholding.

    That is why I asked the question. 50/50 shareholding directors won't be looked at by HMRC in respect of pension contributions as long as the company can support the contributions through trade and profit.

    Funding one spouse more heavily for commercial reasons (e.g. to use their AA and keep the other below LSA) is defensible if the level is still reasonable compared with their duties and the company’s profits.

    Where the spouse is not a shareholder‑director and does little or low‑value work (company secretary, light admin, cleaner), HMRC are much more likely to challenge large employer contributions as not wholly and exclusively for the trade. So, you are not in that scenario.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Roger175
    Roger175 Posts: 332 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Paying off the interest only mortgage is pretty much risk free. There's no 'probably' to consider. Without wanting to get into a debate about stock market bubbles, you could see a significant drop in anything you continue to plough into your pensions should there be a crash/correction (arguably due?). Given your very heathy overall position, this would be a nice safe consolidation move.

  • noitsnotme
    noitsnotme Posts: 1,582 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 20 February at 11:21AM

    I often see both sides of the argument, many saying pay it off and equally as many saying keep the investments. I kind of took the middle ground by clearing one rental property mortgage and keeping the other. I paid off the larger, more expensive commercial mortgage.

    I do keep considering paying it off but we are thinking about retiring early and would need to bridge a gap of up to 5 years (if we went now) before we can access the pensions. While that’s still undecided (I can’t shake the “one more year” syndrome at the moment!) I’m leaning more to not paying it off. As that gap decreases I’ll be more inclined to pay it off. I may even start to pay a chunk off each year and then clear whatever is left in 5 years time.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.