We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Asset rich, cash poor…
Comments
-
Thanks Albermarle! I’ve worked with older people all my career and the house would be a much better option. Really good points. Another 10 years and we won’t get up the stairs in our teeny terrace!Albermarle said:
To add to the above comments.daveyjp said:Getting to know exactly what work is required is key. How old is the property? A 1960s property not touched for 50 years could be a very different proposition to an 1870s property in terms of potential problems over and above what you want doing. You may also want to consider if the layout is still suitable.
I'd certainly be adding a rewire to your immediate needs list, plus soffits, facia boards, guttering, it may need plastering to some areas, especially after a rewire and decorating throughout to finish. You then need carpets and other floor coverings, light fittings, alarm etc. Also don't forget outside. Garden, driveways, walls, fences etc. However with a property to sell you should have equity to borrow against, so funding it shouldn't be a problem.
Selling both and finding a ready to live in property may be worth considering if the thought of the above project is overwhelming and the desire to live in the childhood home isn't overwhelming.
You are 58, so I will assume your partner is a similar age and therefore if you do move to this new home, you will probably grow old there ( gracefully of course) .
In that case the location and accessibility should be taken into account.
Although everybody is different, most older people are better off in area where this is easy access to facilities. Shops; GP surgery ; pubs/restaurants/cafes etc or where they are at least no more than a short drive away, or there are good public transport links.
A lot of steps up to the house/steep driveway/ hilly terrain are also undesirable.
On the other side getting a fully updated house will mean you will not have to get involved in much major building work as you get older. Make sure the garden is reasonably low maintenance, if you do go ahead .0 -
If you mean sell your house, and rent it back from the buyer for 6 months, I think that's not lawful these days (or at the very least there are problematic aspects to it). Hopefully others will confirm one way or the other.Brenster said:Why not sell your house, with an agreement to rent following sale for 6 months, and use the sale funds to make the inerited house what you want it to be.1 -
Hi, have you thought about re-mortgaging your current home and use the released money to fund the building work?
You say that your current house is paid for and that you are still at work, so I assume you have a decent amount of equity in your home and you should be able to get a mortgage as you have a salary coming in.
That would also allow you to stay in your current home until the works in the inherited home have been finished.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
