We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Autumn Budget 2025: Energy bills to fall £150 from April 2026

245

Comments

  • Ildhund
    Ildhund Posts: 746 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    There's what appears to be a sober review of what this all means here: What does the Budget mean for energy bills? | Nesta
    I'm not being lazy ...
    I'm just in energy-saving mode.

  • wrf12345
    wrf12345 Posts: 996 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Posts
    As the £150 is coming off the unit rate rather than s/c (astonishingly, as they were claiming the s/c has to go up because of all these add-on costs), low users will save a lot less but pay more tax if their income goes up because of the frozen tax thresholds. Personally, I have the choice of using ISA money or SIPP drawdown, the one would take me over the frozen tax threshold, the other won't - guess which I will be using? However, even if paying more tax actual net income will still be up (assuming a salary increase which may not happen for many) so there may be a very minor feel good factor in this... assuming Ofgem don't find an excuse to put up the energy costs anyway in April. Getting rid of the absurd s/c's altogether would have scored vastly more political points than the sound bite £150 average reduction which many may not see due to other possible increases and low usage.
  • MattMattMattUK
    MattMattMattUK Posts: 11,837 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    wrf12345 said:
    As the £150 is coming off the unit rate rather than s/c (astonishingly, as they were claiming the s/c has to go up because of all these add-on costs), low users will save a lot less but pay more tax if their income goes up because of the frozen tax thresholds. Personally, I have the choice of using ISA money or SIPP drawdown, the one would take me over the frozen tax threshold, the other won't - guess which I will be using? However, even if paying more tax actual net income will still be up (assuming a salary increase which may not happen for many) so there may be a very minor feel good factor in this... assuming Ofgem don't find an excuse to put up the energy costs anyway in April. Getting rid of the absurd s/c's altogether would have scored vastly more political points than the sound bite £150 average reduction which many may not see due to other possible increases and low usage.
    As has been explained to you hundreds, if not thousands of times, there is a perfectly rational, sensible and "fair" reason for the standing charge to exist. You wanting it abolished and added to the unit rates because you think that would benefit you is not "fair", it is inherently selfish. Additionally your idea of how much would need to be added to unit rates demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the costs. I implore you to educate yourself on the actual facts and figures. 
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 35,235 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 27 November at 10:12AM
    Lorian said:
    I'll believe it when I see it applied to my fix.
    Agreed.  It seems it will only strictly apply to the price cap as that is determined by other than the suppliers, any other tariff is down to the supplier and some will see it as a nice little earner.  The removal of VAT would have been clear, transparent and applicable to all, maybe not as big a saving but smoke and mirror free.

  • Newbie to the forum here but I'd welcome opinions on  whether I should consider fixing in the light of the budget "reduction" in energy bills from next year.

    I am a relatively low user around £1200 per year on dual fuel. I am currently on a capped tariff. Should I still consider fixing?
  • Scot_39
    Scot_39 Posts: 3,978 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 27 November at 10:09AM
    m_c_s said:
    Looney economics. Save £150 on energy but pay it back, plus some more, in higher taxes. Just a transfer to general taxation.
    Where schemes like Eco used to be and where they always belonged.

    Energy bills should be just that - energy bills.

    Not substitutes for proper PROGRESSIVE taxation and proper benefits.

    Shame she hasn't AFAIK removed the WHD levy as well.  Something that really only exists because benefits have not kept track with energy bills - still well above pr3 crisis levels.  But in part because as my other posts the policy line has increased bg £79 / 50% in 21 months to £236.  Now according to BBC budget will reduce by more than tgat massive inflationary increase - by removing £147 

    WHD added Extra £17 oct to support extension to 2.7m more homes, another £7 in Jan,  total cost maybe £31 (150×6.2/29) --> £45 (17×(1+3.4/2.7)+7).  Take it out of bills - and add c£2pw to benefits.  Same net result for recipients.

    Everyone else's bills go down and yes taxes go up - progressive taxes based on income - not energy bills skewed to consumption penalising the poor with high energy needs and letting the rich with solar battery arrays etc off their social obligation.
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 35,235 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Newbie to the forum here but I'd welcome opinions on  whether I should consider fixing in the light of the budget "reduction" in energy bills from next year.

    I am a relatively low user around £1200 per year on dual fuel. I am currently on a capped tariff. Should I still consider fixing?
    You need to work out the actual savings against the cap especially as we are into the high use period.  A current fix at cap usage is £190 below the cap.  Still likely a saving even if the provider does not reduce the rates in April, you can look at fixes with no exit fee.

  • Scot_39
    Scot_39 Posts: 3,978 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 27 November at 10:57AM
    Newbie to the forum here but I'd welcome opinions on  whether I should consider fixing in the light of the budget "reduction" in energy bills from next year.

    I am a relatively low user around £1200 per year on dual fuel. I am currently on a capped tariff. Should I still consider fixing?


    But by capped do you mean one of the discounted pseudo social tariffs (didnt realise still going but suppliers had thrm during crisis again for those in debt) or just the Ofgem cap.  If a special deal you'd need to carefully consider the benefits and risks of losing it if more.

    If havjng thought about your capped deal - you decide to fix and worried tge savings might not be passed through - you could try and find a fee free fix for 4 months.  Octopus used to do them regularly.  And come Apr just switch to cheaper deal if price doesn't drop.

    There is one listed in the current msd table here

    https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/utilities/are-there-any-cheap-fixed-energy-deals-currently-worth-it/


    Dont forget if switching to get a referral code for another £50 duel fuel iirc from friends family or colleagues etc.
  • EssexHebridean
    EssexHebridean Posts: 25,069 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    @Ageingdinosaur If you are currently on the cap then you should probably look for a fix anyway - see what is on offer currently, compare with the rate you are o at the moment, and if you go for something with no exit fee you can swap again if something better comes along. 
    🎉 MORTGAGE FREE (First time!) 30/09/2016 🎉 And now we go again…New mortgage taken 01/09/23 🏡
    Balance as at 01/09/23 = £115,000.00 Balance as at 31/12/23 = £112,000.00
    Balance as at 31/08/24 = £105,400.00 Balance as at 31/12/24 = £102,500.00
    Balance as at 31/08/25 = £ 95,450.00
    £100k barrier broken 1/4/25
    SOA CALCULATOR (for DFW newbies): SOA Calculator
    she/her
  • RR was clearly implying on the Today programme this morning that everyone will save £150, but that, like most things she says, is a lie. 

    Why on earth wasn't the standing charge cut rather than the unit price? That would have been more progressive and is what Martin has campaigned for.

    And apparently the larger part of the supposed £150 saving is only temporary and prices will go back up again in 2029. Funny how that wasn't mentioned in the speech.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.