We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BIK and PCP

Eldi_Dos
Eldi_Dos Posts: 2,415 Forumite
Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
I have read car adverts for many years now and have noticed that when PCP deals are offered that a common sales tactic is for a dealer or manufacturer to offer a 'deposit contribution' given by the dealer or manufacturer, I believe this is done to make the PCP APR % look better, all very good as a sales tactic, but I would argue that the fiqures quoted for the RRP (for want of a better description) are artificially inflated to make the APR look good.

If the initial price used for cars is artificial I would say this works against the many people who pay BIK tax as this would be the price used to work out BIK rather than the market price.

I would appreciate others thoughts on this.

Comments

  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 2,277 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Eldi_Dos said:
    I have read car adverts for many years now and have noticed that when PCP deals are offered that a common sales tactic is for a dealer or manufacturer to offer a 'deposit contribution' given by the dealer or manufacturer, I believe this is done to make the PCP APR % look better, all very good as a sales tactic, but I would argue that the fiqures quoted for the RRP (for want of a better description) are artificially inflated to make the APR look good.

    If the initial price used for cars is artificial I would say this works against the many people who pay BIK tax as this would be the price used to work out BIK rather than the market price.

    I would appreciate others thoughts on this.
    The deposit contribution would make the APR look higher assuming they want/need to make £X profit from the finance which is normally a different company to the seller of the car. The deposit lowers the size of the loan which means to achieve the same £X they need to inflate the interest to achieve it -v- what they would have needed to sell the car on finance at full price. 

    Ultimately people like free stuff and dont stop to think that the interest payments will outweigh the discount but then most people dont have the funds to buy the car cash either. 

    This is nothing new though, cars have always sold under RRP irrespective of if it was cash or finance or something else. Similarly the government has a target to hit on tax revenue so if the price of cars universally dropped you'd probably see the BIK percentages increase to balance the books. 
  • singhini
    singhini Posts: 1,145 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 16 November at 4:27PM
    Eldi_Dos said:
    I have read car adverts for many years now and have noticed that when PCP deals are offered that a common sales tactic is for a dealer or manufacturer to offer a 'deposit contribution' given by the dealer or manufacturer, I believe this is done to make the PCP APR % look better, all very good as a sales tactic, but I would argue that the fiqures quoted for the RRP (for want of a better description) are artificially inflated to make the APR look good.

    If the initial price used for cars is artificial I would say this works against the many people who pay BIK tax as this would be the price used to work out BIK rather than the market price.

    I would appreciate others thoughts on this.
    That’s why BIK exists -----> the government’s basically in on the con.
    1) Manufacturers slap a massive RRP on the car, then slash it with “discounts” -----> you feel like a savvy shopper.
    2) Meanwhile, the government grins all the way to the bank: BIK for company car users, VAT for everyone else, plus that lovely first-year RFL hike on new cars.
    So really, the government aren’t just in the game, they’re the sharks circling the pond while we’re all splashing around.
    I have a tendency to mute most posts so if your expecting me to respond you might be waiting along time!
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 19,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    singhini said:
    , VAT for everyone else, 
    VAT is only charged on the actual (pre-VAT) invoice value, not the list price.
    VAT is also charged, one way or another, on company cars.
  • singhini
    singhini Posts: 1,145 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    singhini said:
    , VAT for everyone else, 
    VAT is only charged on the actual (pre-VAT) invoice value, not the list price.
    VAT is also charged, one way or another, on company cars.
    Take home message   ----->  VAT is charged
    I have a tendency to mute most posts so if your expecting me to respond you might be waiting along time!
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 19,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    singhini said:
    singhini said:
    , VAT for everyone else, 
    VAT is only charged on the actual (pre-VAT) invoice value, not the list price.
    VAT is also charged, one way or another, on company cars.
    Take home message   ----->  VAT is charged
    Yes, but the context of your post upthread was that the RRP being high benefitted the Government by the VAT charged.  I was simply pointing out that the VAT is only charged on the actual value, not the RRP.
  • singhini
    singhini Posts: 1,145 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    singhini said:
    singhini said:
    , VAT for everyone else, 
    VAT is only charged on the actual (pre-VAT) invoice value, not the list price.
    VAT is also charged, one way or another, on company cars.
    Take home message   ----->  VAT is charged
    Yes, but the context of your post upthread was that the RRP being high benefitted the Government by the VAT charged.  I was simply pointing out that the VAT is only charged on the actual value, not the RRP.
    No i didn't say that -----> i mentioned RRP with regards to manufacturers (no mention of RRP on point 2)
    i did claim the government benefit from BIK, VAT, RFL (not that VAT is charged on RRP) 
    I have a tendency to mute most posts so if your expecting me to respond you might be waiting along time!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.