We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Black horse commission claim

jd8935
jd8935 Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi everyone, 
im after a bit of info to see if anyone else’s is having the same thing happen. 
Last feb/march time I emailed black horse using the template with as much info as I had. I got an automated email almost straight away. Since then I’ve had a monthly email saying the same thing. Along the lines of “we have your request and we are really busy, you don’t need to do anything we be in touch in 28 days.” 
I know people that have inquired sooner and had replies. I tried ringing up and basically got nowhere. Not sure what to do as I feel 20 months is quite a long time 

thanks in advanced 

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,085 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Until the FCA makes an official decision on refunds and how the 3 types of DCA (positive, negative, neutral) are to be dealt with, they are on hold. As ever with MSE, Martin and Co jumped the gun, flooding firms with these complaints before anything was even established.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • ManyWays
    ManyWays Posts: 1,632 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    MSE did exactly the right thing. People who have made a complaint earlier will get refunded sooner
    The FCA has put out its proposals this afternoon  https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2025/10/car-finance-compensation-scheme/
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,085 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 8 October at 9:11AM
    ManyWays said:
    MSE did exactly the right thing. People who have made a complaint earlier will get refunded sooner
    The FCA has put out its proposals this afternoon  https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2025/10/car-finance-compensation-scheme/
    Nope, they encouraged people to massively overload the system, causing all of us to pay more for cars/finance in the future as lenders pay for the admin costs, including millions who were never affected (e.g. the people trying to claim compo on 0% deals or never had DCA). As ever, MSE should have waited until the FCA review, which could, based on the court cases, have said there was no case to answer and nothing should be paid. MSE costs us all more by dangling the carrot in front of the greedy

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • ManyWays
    ManyWays Posts: 1,632 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    The problem is, there was no way to tell if you paid DCA except by asking. The FCA research found that in a selection of just over 3,000 DCA agreement, no cases where the consumer was informed there was a DCA .

    So the millions who had a DCA could only find this out by asking. 

    Also MSE's DCA tool explicitly said you would not have a case if you paid 0% interest.

    If MSE had not put this tool out, a lot more people would have signed up with claims firms, not a good idea.

    By getting a significant chunk of the DCA/non DCA decisions made already, the actual Scheme process will be quicker. 
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 11,085 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 13 October at 9:45AM
    ManyWays said:
    The problem is, there was no way to tell if you paid DCA except by asking. The FCA research found that in a selection of just over 3,000 DCA agreement, no cases where the consumer was informed there was a DCA .

    So the millions who had a DCA could only find this out by asking. 

    Also MSE's DCA tool explicitly said you would not have a case if you paid 0% interest.

    If MSE had not put this tool out, a lot more people would have signed up with claims firms, not a good idea.

    By getting a significant chunk of the DCA/non DCA decisions made already, the actual Scheme process will be quicker. 
    As the FCA review has shown, I am right - MSE jumped the gun, wasted millions of pounds of car company money meaning we all pay more. The FCA position now is that anyone who hasn't complained should be contacted meaning the MSE tool was a waste of time as everyone would have been contacted anyway. Anyone without it wouldn't have been contacted but they still sent in their letters

    The MSE tool stating that about 0% is irrelevant, the forum on DCA shows people were still trying it on.

    DCA decisions were not made ready by this, they were literally all just held in a pile until the FCA review was completed, none of them are ready. The standard responses people were getting were saying yes DCA was present but crucially, not covering if it was positive, negative, neutral, so again, people chucking in complaints wasting time and money for no reason as many will get nothing as they had DCA but it wasn't used or even was reduced on the interest rate we pay.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Nasqueron said:
    ManyWays said:
    The problem is, there was no way to tell if you paid DCA except by asking. The FCA research found that in a selection of just over 3,000 DCA agreement, no cases where the consumer was informed there was a DCA .

    So the millions who had a DCA could only find this out by asking. 

    Also MSE's DCA tool explicitly said you would not have a case if you paid 0% interest.

    If MSE had not put this tool out, a lot more people would have signed up with claims firms, not a good idea.

    By getting a significant chunk of the DCA/non DCA decisions made already, the actual Scheme process will be quicker. 
    As the FCA review has shown, I am right - MSE jumped the gun, wasted millions of pounds of car company money meaning we all pay more. The FCA position now is that anyone who hasn't complained should be contacted meaning the MSE tool was a waste of time as everyone would have been contacted anyway. Anyone without it wouldn't have been contacted but they still sent in their letters

    The MSE tool stating that about 0% is irrelevant, the forum on DCA shows people were still trying it on.

    DCA decisions were not made ready by this, they were literally all just held in a pile until the FCA review was completed, none of them are ready. The standard responses people were getting were saying yes DCA was present but crucially, not covering if it was positive, negative, neutral, so again, people chucking in complaints wasting time and money for no reason as many will get nothing as they had DCA but it wasn't used or even was reduced on the interest rate we pay.
    it may come to a point where finance companies will pay out regardless, on aged agreements particularly where they may no longer have the records to look at agreements, it use to be the case where files were only kept 6 years for audit purposes.

    as for trying it on - there has been a historic issue with disclosure and transparency - hardly surprising car dealers get a bad reputation 

    only time will tell who gets what if anything 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.