We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

LGPS AVCs vs S&S LISA

MTB1986
MTB1986 Posts: 56 Forumite
Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
Aside from the difference in earliest age they can be accessed (55/57 versus 60) and contribution limits per annum, is there a material benefit to contributing a regular monthly amount into one of these versus the other?  

LISA contributions are made from post tax salary, with 25% uplift, and available at 60 for retirement with zero tax.  LGPS AVCs are made with tax relief from salary and available to take at 55/57 as a tax free lump sum if required.  Does one of these work out better overall for contributions/returns, assuming investments into the same funds?

My LGPS provider doesn't permit salary sacrifice, so contributions would not receive any NI benefit.  I'm a basic rate taxpayer and expect to be in retirement too.


Comments

  • El_Torro
    El_Torro Posts: 1,981 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 October at 5:38PM
    If you're going to be a 20% tax payer in retirement and you are one now then the LISA is more tax efficient than a pension. So might as well go with that, as long as you are you happy with waiting to access the money until you are 60. 

    EDIT: To elaborate:

    Put £4k into a LISA now, with a £1k top up that's £5k. You can take out the £5k tax free when you hit 60. 

    Put £4k into a pension now and the tax relief tops it up to £5k. When you withdraw you will pay 20% tax on 75% of the money, so you only get £4.25k after tax.
  • MTB1986
    MTB1986 Posts: 56 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    El_Torro said:
    If you're going to be a 20% tax payer in retirement and you are one now then the LISA is more tax efficient than a pension. So might as well go with that, as long as you are you happy with waiting to access the money until you are 60. 

    EDIT: To elaborate:

    Put £4k into a LISA now, with a £1k top up that's £5k. You can take out the £5k tax free when you hit 60. 

    Put £4k into a pension now and the tax relief tops it up to £5k. When you withdraw you will pay 20% tax on 75% of the money, so you only get £4.25k after tax.
    Thanks for that, I’d be looking to use the LGPS facility of taking the whole AVC as a tax free lump sum though, so wouldn’t have to worry about being taxed (as long as the current rules stay in place). 
  • El_Torro
    El_Torro Posts: 1,981 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ah, ok, I missed that from your opening post. 

    In that case I don't see any difference between the two in terms of the money you get. So the pension wins because you can access it sooner. 
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 13,734 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 October at 7:01PM
    Also ask questions of your provider if they have looked into offering AVCs as salary sacrifice and if they have why it was discounted as an option.
  • MTB1986
    MTB1986 Posts: 56 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    daveyjp said:
    Also ask questions of your provider if they have looked into offering AVCs as salary sacrifice and if they have why it was discounted as an option.
    I’ve asked the question, awaiting an answer, seems like a win-win for members and the scheme so I’d be interested to know why it’s not already in place. 
  • AlanP_2
    AlanP_2 Posts: 3,539 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MTB1986 said:
    daveyjp said:
    Also ask questions of your provider if they have looked into offering AVCs as salary sacrifice and if they have why it was discounted as an option.
    I’ve asked the question, awaiting an answer, seems like a win-win for members and the scheme so I’d be interested to know why it’s not already in place. 
    No benefit to the scheme as it is your employer who pays you, and the Employers NI that they would save, not the scheme so you may be asking the wrong people.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.