We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I own a home but my partner doesn't. If we get joint mortgage is their 50% stamp duty?
Comments
-
Your probably at the point now where you want to get professional advice. Have you researched joint borrower, sole proprietor mortgages, and the risks involved?kevinqq said:
And that would negate any stamp duty burden I am carrying??kingstreet said:
That's not always the case. A 'joint borrower, sole proprietor' approach may be possible.p00hsticks said:
It's not the mortgage, it's the ownership of the property.kevinqq said:
Probably not but of course I would be renting out my old house for about £1800p/m to give her income. It is a bit shaky I suppose.sheramber said:
Can she get the necessary mortgage on her wage alone?kevinqq said:
Deeds are me only on my current home (no mortgage). So partner should/could get the mortgage herself and I could be her live in tenant?MeteredOut said:You only mention mortgage, not who will be on the deeds. Assuming you'll also jointly own the house, the purchase will attract the higher rate (+3%) of SDLT. The purchase will also not qualify for first time buyers relief.
The property would have to be in the first time buyers name only, and that may introduce a challenge in then getting a joint mortgage.
So does the full stamp duty kick in if it's a joint mortgage? No discount??
But for a joint mortgage, the mortgage company will expect to see both of you on the deeds.
and as you'll be going from owning one property to two, the additional SDLT will apply.
You would have no legal ownership over the second property, but would be jointly liable to pay for it. eg, if the other person was made bankrupt, they could lose the house and you'd still be liable for the mortgage payments.2 -
Thanks. Maybe not worth it to avoid some poxy stamp duty.MeteredOut said:
Your probably at the point now where you want to get professional advice. Have you researched joint borrower, sole proprietor mortgages, and the risks involved?kevinqq said:
And that would negate any stamp duty burden I am carrying??kingstreet said:
That's not always the case. A 'joint borrower, sole proprietor' approach may be possible.p00hsticks said:
It's not the mortgage, it's the ownership of the property.kevinqq said:
Probably not but of course I would be renting out my old house for about £1800p/m to give her income. It is a bit shaky I suppose.sheramber said:
Can she get the necessary mortgage on her wage alone?kevinqq said:
Deeds are me only on my current home (no mortgage). So partner should/could get the mortgage herself and I could be her live in tenant?MeteredOut said:You only mention mortgage, not who will be on the deeds. Assuming you'll also jointly own the house, the purchase will attract the higher rate (+3%) of SDLT. The purchase will also not qualify for first time buyers relief.
The property would have to be in the first time buyers name only, and that may introduce a challenge in then getting a joint mortgage.
So does the full stamp duty kick in if it's a joint mortgage? No discount??
But for a joint mortgage, the mortgage company will expect to see both of you on the deeds.
and as you'll be going from owning one property to two, the additional SDLT will apply.
You would have no legal ownership over the second property, but would be jointly liable to pay for it. eg, if the other person was made bankrupt, they could lose the house and you'd still be liable for the mortgage payments.0 -
Hi, when my husband left my brother came on the mortgage with me. He has his own house with mortgage so had to pay stamp duty to come onto mine aswel. But through the solicitor we had a deed of trust written up with me owning 75% of the house and him 25% (this was on the basis on how much i would get offered on a singular mortgage) meaning that he only had to pay stamp duty on the percentage of house that he would own - so the 25%. It made the stamp duty lower than if he owned it 50/50 with me1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards