We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MSE Forum poll: Self checkout vs human cashier?
Comments
-
Online so don't use either0
-
Self scan as you go for me. No unpacking or repacking, zap the screen and off you go.0
-
Great ideaeddddy said:
Supermarkets are very competitive businesses, and many customers are very focussed on paying low prices. If customers believe that one supermarket is cheaper than another, many people will choose the cheaper one.
So supermarkets look for any way they can to reduce costs, so that they can charge the lowest prices.
One way of reducing costs is by introducing self-checkouts.
(As an illustration, Waitrose often seem to employ more people in their stores on checkouts, deli counters, meat counters, fish counters, etc - but they charge higher prices, to pay for all those people.)
I've often thought that a good solution might be for supermarkets to keep their prices as low a possible, on the assumption that customers will use self-checkouts - but if customer prefers a member of staff to scan their shopping, they pay an extra 50p or £1 to cover the extra staff costs.
0 -
Sounds feasible to me.gocurlygirl said:
Great ideaeddddy said:
Supermarkets are very competitive businesses, and many customers are very focussed on paying low prices. If customers believe that one supermarket is cheaper than another, many people will choose the cheaper one.
So supermarkets look for any way they can to reduce costs, so that they can charge the lowest prices.
One way of reducing costs is by introducing self-checkouts.
(As an illustration, Waitrose often seem to employ more people in their stores on checkouts, deli counters, meat counters, fish counters, etc - but they charge higher prices, to pay for all those people.)
I've often thought that a good solution might be for supermarkets to keep their prices as low a possible, on the assumption that customers will use self-checkouts - but if customer prefers a member of staff to scan their shopping, they pay an extra 50p or £1 to cover the extra staff costs.
0 -
Maybe if using Self-scan you should be treated as an employee and receive suitable benefits.
I would rather use a checkout with a person and keep them in employment.1 -
Human where possible. I can't remember when I last had a glitch at a staffed checkout. My branch of Boots seems to be 100% self checkout and at least 1 in 3 times I shop there, there are problems. Plus if I'm putting my shopping in a bag which already has stuff in, some self checkouts have a hissy fit.0
-
I'd have already scanned it myself with a handset and bagged it. Why handle stuff three times when once is enough?0
-
Potential danger there is that it could be seen as discriminatory as more disabled people would prefer, or need, to use the manned checkouts. If a visually impaired person asks for help to do their shopping they don't get charged a fee for the extra help.gocurlygirl said:
Great ideaeddddy said:
Supermarkets are very competitive businesses, and many customers are very focussed on paying low prices. If customers believe that one supermarket is cheaper than another, many people will choose the cheaper one.
So supermarkets look for any way they can to reduce costs, so that they can charge the lowest prices.
One way of reducing costs is by introducing self-checkouts.
(As an illustration, Waitrose often seem to employ more people in their stores on checkouts, deli counters, meat counters, fish counters, etc - but they charge higher prices, to pay for all those people.)
I've often thought that a good solution might be for supermarkets to keep their prices as low a possible, on the assumption that customers will use self-checkouts - but if customer prefers a member of staff to scan their shopping, they pay an extra 50p or £1 to cover the extra staff costs.
0 -
Self checkout everytime for me as it avoids the "chatty folk" having the craic at the tills.
Plus, I'm quicker than the till folk at my local supermarket - but certainly not quicker than the Aldi till folk, who I think are on crack rather than having it! 😉0 -
I put cashier because supermarkets have been encouraged to remove cash self service at who ever's whim which encourages a cashless society which is harmful.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
