We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

How to force a former employer to reply to a letter?

13

Comments

  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 14,926 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    elsien said:
    Little point doing a SAR when the OP already knows what the reference says. The issue seems to be with the interpretation.
    They may not have seen the whole reference.
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • robatwork
    robatwork Posts: 7,284 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I used to write references on occasion. 

    BAD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013

    GOOD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013 and I would have no hesitation in employing him again


    REALLY BAD would be putting in anything about sick time, performance or attitude. Even an ambivalent comment would without doubt be something negative. 
  • Lomast
    Lomast Posts: 875 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    robatwork said:
    I used to write references on occasion. 

    BAD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013

    GOOD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013 and I would have no hesitation in employing him again


    REALLY BAD would be putting in anything about sick time, performance or attitude. Even an ambivalent comment would without doubt be something negative. 
    I don't agree with your first one necessarily being bad, it's all a lot of employers give these days, our references at work give start date, end date and job title, regardless off if they were a total moron or our best worker
  • MattMattMattUK
    MattMattMattUK Posts: 11,549 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    robatwork said:
    I used to write references on occasion. 

    BAD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013

    GOOD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013 and I would have no hesitation in employing him again


    REALLY BAD would be putting in anything about sick time, performance or attitude. Even an ambivalent comment would without doubt be something negative. 
    I have not seen a reference that did anything other than confirm employment dates and job title for more than a decade. I would be suspicious of anything else now.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,454 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Really does depend on your line of work. My company still want full references. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Uriziel
    Uriziel Posts: 194 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
  • Jude57
    Jude57 Posts: 755 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Uriziel said:
    Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
    I can't imagine any employer being impressed by a potential new member of staff criticising their former employer. What would the OP gain from following your suggestion, other than to reassure the potential new employer that they were right to withdraw their offer?
  • Uriziel
    Uriziel Posts: 194 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Jude57 said:
    Uriziel said:
    Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
    I can't imagine any employer being impressed by a potential new member of staff criticising their former employer. What would the OP gain from following your suggestion, other than to reassure the potential new employer that they were right to withdraw their offer?
    You are assuming and generalizing. Fact is that the world is filled with sickening people who are put in charge. Everyone has had vile bosses in their life and now that millennials are taking up leadership roles they are absolutely not afraid of calling things out for what they are which you would not know if the number in your username is your age. I have had interviews previously where I told interviewers about what I am seeing at my job and we laughed together. We were both millennials and I was progressed to the next interview stage with no problem.
    There is absolutely nothing wrong with the OP explaining himself. In this day and age every single thing is about politics. If he can convince the new employer that the previous employer are not the kind of people that they would like to be friends with they will be happy to take him.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,454 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Nothing special about millennials, gen z,  boomers whatever label gets stuck on you. 

    Friendship and employment are two completely different things - whether a new employer thinks they would be friends with the old one doesn’t come into the equation with regards to hiring decisions (Outside of it’s not what you know it’s who you know brigade)

    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Jude57
    Jude57 Posts: 755 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Uriziel said:
    Jude57 said:
    Uriziel said:
    Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
    I can't imagine any employer being impressed by a potential new member of staff criticising their former employer. What would the OP gain from following your suggestion, other than to reassure the potential new employer that they were right to withdraw their offer?
    You are assuming and generalizing. Fact is that the world is filled with sickening people who are put in charge. Everyone has had vile bosses in their life and now that millennials are taking up leadership roles they are absolutely not afraid of calling things out for what they are which you would not know if the number in your username is your age. I have had interviews previously where I told interviewers about what I am seeing at my job and we laughed together. We were both millennials and I was progressed to the next interview stage with no problem.
    There is absolutely nothing wrong with the OP explaining himself. In this day and age every single thing is about politics. If he can convince the new employer that the previous employer are not the kind of people that they would like to be friends with they will be happy to take him.
    The number in my username is neither my age nor my date of birth. It's amusing that you accuse me of making assumptions yet have the temerity to go on to tell me what I 'wouldn't know'. If you knew anything about me, you'd know that, as well as having managed and trained staff at all levels in the public, private and third sectors, I have spent my entire working life 'calling out' bad management, processes and policies, and have achieved real, tangible change in those organisations. But that would require you to consider that others here have real life experience of how organisations operate, not how they should be but how they are, and to advise based on that experience.


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.