We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How to force a former employer to reply to a letter?
Comments
-
elsien said:Little point doing a SAR when the OP already knows what the reference says. The issue seems to be with the interpretation.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0
-
I used to write references on occasion.
BAD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013
GOOD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013 and I would have no hesitation in employing him again
REALLY BAD would be putting in anything about sick time, performance or attitude. Even an ambivalent comment would without doubt be something negative.0 -
robatwork said:I used to write references on occasion.
BAD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013
GOOD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013 and I would have no hesitation in employing him again
REALLY BAD would be putting in anything about sick time, performance or attitude. Even an ambivalent comment would without doubt be something negative.0 -
robatwork said:I used to write references on occasion.
BAD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013
GOOD: Charles Chomondley was employed at VectorVictor from 01/06/2007 to 05/08/2013 and I would have no hesitation in employing him again
REALLY BAD would be putting in anything about sick time, performance or attitude. Even an ambivalent comment would without doubt be something negative.0 -
Really does depend on your line of work. My company still want full references.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.0
-
Uriziel said:Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
1 -
Jude57 said:Uriziel said:Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the OP explaining himself. In this day and age every single thing is about politics. If he can convince the new employer that the previous employer are not the kind of people that they would like to be friends with they will be happy to take him.0 -
Nothing special about millennials, gen z, boomers whatever label gets stuck on you.Friendship and employment are two completely different things - whether a new employer thinks they would be friends with the old one doesn’t come into the equation with regards to hiring decisions (Outside of it’s not what you know it’s who you know brigade)All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2 -
Uriziel said:Jude57 said:Uriziel said:Have you tried to explain this to your new employer and clarify that the reference is very vague because they are trying to stay out of legal trouble and maybe let them know that perhaps the previous employer was not the most appropriate? I really don't think there is anything you can do.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the OP explaining himself. In this day and age every single thing is about politics. If he can convince the new employer that the previous employer are not the kind of people that they would like to be friends with they will be happy to take him.
4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards