We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How Do You Invest in Retirement?
Options

bfgun
Posts: 238 Forumite


I’m wondering how I will invest my pensions and ISA’s in retirement tax efficiently.
Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.
If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.
If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.
What do people here do?
0
Comments
-
Annuities are currently better value than safe withdrawal rates are.Global index funds might generate 7-10% gross, but again they might not. They're vulnerable to many common things that aren't even close to being "black swan" events.bfgun said:What do people here do?N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!6 -
Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.I assume you mean annuity rate rather than interest rate.
Annuities are being sold like hotcakes at the moment. The rates are the highest they have been since 2008.
Why don't you think they offer good value?If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.You appear to be expecting returns higher than is sensible to plan on
Plus, not many retired people would go 100% equities.
Since 1915 (when reliable data first started), real returns on 100% global equities gives the following:
median 1 year return = 8%
median 5 year return = 7% annualised
median 10 year return = 7% annualised
median 20 year return = 6% annualised.
worst 1 year return = -39%
worst 5 year return = -11% annualised
worst 10 year return = -4% annualised
worst 20 year return = 1% annualised.
best 1 year return = 49%
best 5 year return = 24% annualised
best 10 year return = 17% annualised
best 20 year return = 12% annualised.
You are going to live 20-30 years, maybe?
You are looking at returns that would be in the optimistic ballpark.
What would you do if you had that 20-year return of 1% per annum (Dec 1961 to Nov 1981)?What do people here do?Whatever is appropriate for them, probably. The objectives will differ. Largely depending on other income sources (secure vs insecure), cash savings, savings levels, budget and spending needs and objectives.
Most probably use far more sensible figures in their projections. i.e. plan for the worst but hope for the best. Unlike your plan for the best and hope you get it.
Someone with several hundreds of pounds in cash and secure incomes covering 75% of their spending needs before they even look at their uncrystallised pension fund will have a different view to someone with £10k in the bank and secure income that only covers 25% of their spending needs
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.5 -
bfgun said:I’m wondering how I will invest my pensions and ISA’s in retirement tax efficiently.Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.
If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.What do people here do?Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!2 -
QrizB said:Annuities are currently better value than safe withdrawal rates are.Global index funds might generate 7-10% gross, but again they might not. They're vulnerable to many common things that aren't even close to being "black swan" events.bfgun said:What do people here do?
I appreciate one can never tell, and as we have seen with tariffs etc., the markets can swing violently.1 -
dunstonh said:Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.I assume you mean annuity rate rather than interest rate.
Annuities are being sold like hotcakes at the moment. The rates are the highest they have been since 2008.
Why don't you think they offer good value?If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.You appear to be expecting returns higher than is sensible to plan on
Plus, not many retired people would go 100% equities.
Since 1915 (when reliable data first started), real returns on 100% global equities gives the following:
median 1 year return = 8%
median 5 year return = 7% annualised
median 10 year return = 7% annualised
median 20 year return = 6% annualised.
worst 1 year return = -39%
worst 5 year return = -11% annualised
worst 10 year return = -4% annualised
worst 20 year return = 1% annualised.
best 1 year return = 49%
best 5 year return = 24% annualised
best 10 year return = 17% annualised
best 20 year return = 12% annualised.
You are going to live 20-30 years, maybe?
You are looking at returns that would be in the optimistic ballpark.
What would you do if you had that 20-year return of 1% per annum (Dec 1961 to Nov 1981)?What do people here do?Whatever is appropriate for them, probably. The objectives will differ. Largely depending on other income sources (secure vs insecure), cash savings, savings levels, budget and spending needs and objectives.
Most probably use far more sensible figures in their projections. i.e. plan for the worst but hope for the best. Unlike your plan for the best and hope you get it.
Someone with several hundreds of pounds in cash and secure incomes covering 75% of their spending needs before they even look at their uncrystallised pension fund will have a different view to someone with £10k in the bank and secure income that only covers 25% of their spending needs
Yes, I did mean annuity rates, not interest. Thanks for pointing that out and for providing the overview of global index returns throughout that time period. It does put it into perspective.1 -
The vast majority of people don't want to be worrying about whether they need to be shopping at Waitrose one week and the food bank the next in retirement. For most it isn't about getting the biggest growth on your investments, it is about knowing what you have now and for the rest of your life, subject to changes in legislation and curve balls.
If your retirement hobby is financial planning and playing the various markets then maybe a different story, but I'd rather allocate £20 a month into a Paddy Power account.
Regardless of how the current ups and downs maybe seen as totally 'normal', it must be a very uncertain time across most markets. You can normally get a sense by the price of gold.3 -
bfgun said:I’m wondering how I will invest my pensions and ISA’s in retirement tax efficiently.Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.
If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.What do people here do?
Inflation protected income streams (e.g., State pension, DB pensions, and annuities) form a guaranteed* floor to income
Income from a portfolio can, in real terms, either be variable (e.g., withdrawing a constant percentage of the amount in the portfolio) and last a lifetime (but income might be small in some years) or fixed (e.g., the constant dollar or 'safe' withdrawal rate approach) where it is constant with time but might fall to zero before death (or some combination of the two approaches).
To some extent, the investment approach (e.g., the balance between equities and fixed income in the portfolio) then follows from this.
FWIW, most of our retirement income is derived from guaranteed sources (SP and DB pension) and therefore in the longer-term our investment portfolio will be fairly equity heavy (80% in a world index fund) in order to, hopefully, provide a larger legacy.
* Guaranteed except in the event of some extreme events, e.g., UK government debt default.2 -
My wife and I are invested 80% in global equity index funds and 20% in short-term gilt funds.
However our basic spending (food, utilities, council tax, insurance etc) is covered by guaranteed income from defined benefit pensions and a gilt ladder. I'm not sure how relevant that is for you - you really need to find your own solution based on your own circumstances and skills.
I disagree with what you say about annuities - rates are higher than they have been for well over a decade and they offer a great no-effort security blanket.
You may decide that exchanging half your investment pot for an annuity gives you the best of both worlds. You could then further split your annuities between fixed and index-linked depending on your expected spending profile during retirement.
1 -
dunstonh said:Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.I assume you mean annuity rate rather than interest rate.
Annuities are being sold like hotcakes at the moment. The rates are the highest they have been since 2008.
Why don't you think they offer good value?If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.You appear to be expecting returns higher than is sensible to plan on
Plus, not many retired people would go 100% equities.
Since 1915 (when reliable data first started), real returns on 100% global equities gives the following:
median 1 year return = 8%
median 5 year return = 7% annualised
median 10 year return = 7% annualised
median 20 year return = 6% annualised.
worst 1 year return = -39%
worst 5 year return = -11% annualised
worst 10 year return = -4% annualised
worst 20 year return = 1% annualised.
best 1 year return = 49%
best 5 year return = 24% annualised
best 10 year return = 17% annualised
best 20 year return = 12% annualised.
You are going to live 20-30 years, maybe?
You are looking at returns that would be in the optimistic ballpark.
What would you do if you had that 20-year return of 1% per annum (Dec 1961 to Nov 1981)?What do people here do?Whatever is appropriate for them, probably. The objectives will differ. Largely depending on other income sources (secure vs insecure), cash savings, savings levels, budget and spending needs and objectives.
Most probably use far more sensible figures in their projections. i.e. plan for the worst but hope for the best. Unlike your plan for the best and hope you get it.
Someone with several hundreds of pounds in cash and secure incomes covering 75% of their spending needs before they even look at their uncrystallised pension fund will have a different view to someone with £10k in the bank and secure income that only covers 25% of their spending needs1 -
Strummer22 said:dunstonh said:Annuity’s don’t seem to offer great interest rates.I assume you mean annuity rate rather than interest rate.
Annuities are being sold like hotcakes at the moment. The rates are the highest they have been since 2008.
Why don't you think they offer good value?If the money is put into a global index fund, this could generate a 7-10% annual return on average, but could suffer if a black swan event occurs.You appear to be expecting returns higher than is sensible to plan on
Plus, not many retired people would go 100% equities.
Since 1915 (when reliable data first started), real returns on 100% global equities gives the following:
median 1 year return = 8%
median 5 year return = 7% annualised
median 10 year return = 7% annualised
median 20 year return = 6% annualised.
worst 1 year return = -39%
worst 5 year return = -11% annualised
worst 10 year return = -4% annualised
worst 20 year return = 1% annualised.
best 1 year return = 49%
best 5 year return = 24% annualised
best 10 year return = 17% annualised
best 20 year return = 12% annualised.
You are going to live 20-30 years, maybe?
You are looking at returns that would be in the optimistic ballpark.
What would you do if you had that 20-year return of 1% per annum (Dec 1961 to Nov 1981)?What do people here do?Whatever is appropriate for them, probably. The objectives will differ. Largely depending on other income sources (secure vs insecure), cash savings, savings levels, budget and spending needs and objectives.
Most probably use far more sensible figures in their projections. i.e. plan for the worst but hope for the best. Unlike your plan for the best and hope you get it.
Someone with several hundreds of pounds in cash and secure incomes covering 75% of their spending needs before they even look at their uncrystallised pension fund will have a different view to someone with £10k in the bank and secure income that only covers 25% of their spending needsI am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards