We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

'Therabreath'

13»

Comments

  • Dustangle
    Dustangle Posts: 844 Forumite
    melbury wrote: »
    Sounds great, but can it also help with nicotine withdrawal symptoms? I haven't smoked for ten days now and would like nice clean teeth but also no cravings.
    Yes, of course. It will also handle spots, dyspepsia, theological doubt, and thickening ankles. For an additional forty pounds, we can supply the new "Feculum-Begone"® Colonic Irrigation attachment and 500g of soluble solution. Two treatments may be needed to begin with to completely clear encrusted feculent matters, but thereafter one go a week will radically improve your quality of life.
  • vk2003
    vk2003 Posts: 289 Forumite
    s.truth wrote: »
    thanks pepperoni, your time consuming research has proved to be a useful resource. Its good that the majority of people on this site put their talents and abilities to useful purpose. The results in that paper showed it is a beneficial process and apparently, the process has been fine tuned since that paper was written and the results have been greatly improved.For the wannabee dentists and cynics:- try not generating negativity, just for a day or two and see how much better you feel, the chances are you really are missing out on a better life.

    Thank goodness the attitudes on this thread are not indicative of the state of the Nation.

    Quoting from the paper cited earlier:

    "The magnetized water oral irrigator could be a useful adjunct in the prevention of calculus accumulation in periodontal patients, but appears to have minimal effect on plaque reduction. The results indicated a clinical improvement in the gingival index, but this was not a statistically significant finding."

    "Not a statistically significant finding" seems to sum up what cobblers this is. And the assertion by the OP that dentists don't recommend this because it will reduce their business is quite frankly nonsense too.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.