We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ECP DCB Legal court claim 2025
Options

Clopdog
Posts: 20 Forumite

Hi all sorry for another thread on this but it’s my turn to receive the court letter .
I was meeting a mate in Manchester and this was nearest car park to hotel but as I pulled in my mate text me to tell me not to park here as car will get smashed. I checked online to check reviews and he was correct. Endless amount of bad reviews and pictures of car windows smashed . I there for checked online for an alternative place to park then left . No idea this place had a camera on the way in as it was just a gravel pit. I never left the car and just pulled out to then receive a £100 fine . I appealed this but yet again refused.
Do I just pay this and be done with it or shall I go down this thread route .
Thanks in advanced
0
Comments
-
Carnt believe it’s still going0
-
They had 6 years to issue a court claim, standard stuff
Do the AOS online ASAP and then look at the other recent cases on here, since the middle of April and draft your 2 or 3 paragraphs for the defence template, same as everyone else , then post them below for critique
No paying2 -
Are we 100% this won’t go to court . Or way off that yet and will keep asking for this payment first . Whats aos online sorry ?0
-
Study the newbies sticky thread in announcements near the top of the forum by coupon mad, especially post 5 ans post 2, then study the 12 steps in the defence template thread in announcements near the top of the forum by coupon mad too
Nothing can be guaranteed 100% , but they do tend to discontinue before the hearing fee deadline is due, with us helping you get through it
In any case, a loss in court is cheaper than paying the silly total on the claim form1 -
Clopdog said:Are we 100% this won’t go to court .PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
Ok so I’ll fill in the money claim online , then I’ll post my defence on here over the weekend . Cheers1
-
Use the template defence. Just amend paragraph 3 to state the same circumstances you told us, but add a sentence stating you did not agree the contractual terms on offer and left. Therefore no contract exists between the defendant and the claimant, and therefore no contractual terms were breached.
99.99999% chance of them discontinuing. Although seems like such a decent case you'll probably end up disappointed you won't be able to tear them a new one in court. Another absolutely ridiculous robo-claim.
Although, having said that you can kick off during your mediation phone call in a few months. Or tell them you owe them zero and end the conversation after 10 seconds. Your call!1 -
Much appreciated just going to write paragraph 3 now so all the rest I just leave sign and date .1
-
3. Referring to the POC: paragraph 1 is denied. The Defendant is not indebted to the Claimant. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant does not accept that a contravention occurred on 23/06/2020, as alleged. Whilst the Defendant is the registered keeper, paragraphs 3 and 4 are denied. The Defendant is not liable and has seen no evidence of a breach of prominent terms. The quantum is hugely exaggerated and there were no damages incurred whatsoever.
0 -
3.1. In regards to the day in question, the Defendant entered the car park for a brief period of time only. The Defendant did not park as they were concerned as to the safety of their vehicle within this car park. The Defendant was unaware of parking restrictions in place. The Defendant had not noticed any ‘Prominent’ signage close to where the vehicle was parked, showing the terms and conditions for usage. The small signage was not suitable to alert a motorist, leading to an unawareness of any parking restrictions.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards