We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Calories burned

MouldyOldDough
Posts: 2,558 Forumite

I have a DKN exercise bike with a built in calorie counter
This morning - I reached the magical figure of 300 calories in 10 minutes at level 20 at a constant 20kmph - how accurate is this calorie counter going to be ?
I have no idea what 300 calories feels like......
0
Comments
-
I'd say calorie counters on exercise equipment famously overstate calorie burn.
They have no way of knowing how much you weigh - the body will expend considerably more energy if you are bigger. As an example, a Harvard study suggests that a 125lb person (8st 13lb / 56.8kg) jogging at 5mph for 10 mins would burn about 80 calories. A 155lb (11st 1lb/70.5kg) person would burn about 100 calories and a 185lb person (13st 3lb/84.1kg) would burn around 120 calories. You can see here that the heavier person exhausted 50% more calories doing the same exercise.
This isn't just if a person if overweight, in fact a person with a high level of muscle would require more calories (as muscle consumes more calories than fat). The larger the mass, the more energy it takes to move.
That's also not considering gender (where men require more calories as they naturally have higher muscle to fat proportions).
I don't know what level 20 is, but 300 calories burned in 10 minutes is extreme and to reach that likely would require someone to be sustaining maximum intensity exercise for 10 minutes straight (like sprinting). Not impossible, but unlikely.Know what you don't1 -
MouldyOldDough said:I have a DKN exercise bike with a built in calorie counterThis morning - I reached the magical figure of 300 calories in 10 minutes at level 20 at a constant 20kmph - how accurate is this calorie counter going to be ?I have no idea what 300 calories feels like......
By comparison, if I run 5k (which takes much longer than 10 minutes), my tracker records a little under 300 calories.
Do you have access to a fitness tracker / watch that can give a more personal assessment of calories burned than the fitness machine?
Martin Lewis claims to burn an average of just under 4k calories in a day.
He must eat a lot.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6580142/martin-lewis-in-2024-i-averaged-24-703-steps-a-day-burning-3-850-calories-heres-how1 -
MouldyOldDough said:I have a DKN exercise bike with a built in calorie counterThis morning - I reached the magical figure of 300 calories in 10 minutes at level 20 at a constant 20kmph - how accurate is this calorie counter going to be ?I have no idea what 300 calories feels like......
1 -
MouldyOldDough said:I have a DKN exercise bike with a built in calorie counterThis morning - I reached the magical figure of 300 calories in 10 minutes at level 20 at a constant 20kmph - how accurate is this calorie counter going to be ?I have no idea what 300 calories feels like......
The other metric would be how big a puddle of sweat you have under the bike....1 -
MouldyOldDough said:I have a DKN exercise bike with a built in calorie counterThis morning - I reached the magical figure of 300 calories in 10 minutes at level 20 at a constant 20kmph - how accurate is this calorie counter going to be ?I have no idea what 300 calories feels like......
It's only real value is for comparing different exercise sessions to see the relative work done in one session as against anotherhamiltonian said:MouldyOldDough said:I have a DKN exercise bike with a built in calorie counterThis morning - I reached the magical figure of 300 calories in 10 minutes at level 20 at a constant 20kmph - how accurate is this calorie counter going to be ?I have no idea what 300 calories feels like......
On Saturday my wife and I did a relatively leisurely 5 mile stroll in two hours and my watch told me I'd burned 682 calories - apparently.
I use a Coros Pace 2 that I've also compared with my wife's Garmin 245(?) and both watches show widely differing calorie consumption for the same running sessions.
I don't believe any of these devices give meangful results when it comes to calories burned. (Except fo comparing the effort put into different sessions - and even then I'm not sure)
0 -
Inspired by this thread I did a session on the assault bike and 100 calories took 14:38 minutes:seconds.0
-
Another exercise comparison for calories burned. 338 calories on the treadmill this morning took 28:11 minutes:seconds. For the same exercise, my fitness tracker logged 291 calories. I could have run the distance covered faster so, presumably, accrued the same calorie burn quicker, but no way could I have been three times quicker.0
-
I agree that 300 calories in 10 minutes sounds impressive. It is possible, but I'd check it, though.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards