We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

IHT Changes

I just wanted to check I understand this correctly. Before the proposed changes to pensions in the budget ref IHT, if I had died with, say, £500k in a SIPP, then I could have passed this to my son and it would have been free of IHT charges. (Assume I have passed on my home too, which takes out the £350k x 2 allowance as it is worth £1m).
Following the changes, is it correct that the £500k in the SIPP will in future be taxed at 40% IHT? When my son then withdraws the remaining £300k, does he get taxed on this again as income?
Apologies for trying to keep this simple as possible, but it seems a pretty massive change in pension taxation which, farmers aside, we're not hearing much about.

Comments

  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 2,060 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Depends on how old you are when you die.  Under 75 no income tax; over 75 income tax.
  • Triumph13
    Triumph13 Posts: 2,066 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    Apart from the under 75 anomaly, yes it does get taxed twice and this is a feature, not a bug.  The idea is that putting money into a pension shouldn't be a way to reduce IHT.  If you'd saved in an ISA instead, the money would be taxed twice, as income for you then IHT on your estate.  By using a pension you avoided paying tax on the original income so taxing it as income for your kids levels the playing field.

    There was a fair bit of kerfuffle when it was first announced (I know I was cross at the prospect of an extra £400k of IHT) and there is still plenty of grumbling about the mechanics of how it's done, but I think most people have accepted that in essence it isn't unreasonable - or no more unreasonable than IHT generally.
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 21,909 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hopefully you will live a long life and spend lots of it, that is the best way to reduce IHT.
  • MarzipanCrumble
    MarzipanCrumble Posts: 368 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Yes agree - if only I could!  

    Being brought up by grandparents who lived through the war (second hand/market shopping) and a parent who was supporting husband through uni,I really baulk at spending.  Yet I am in the IHT bracket. 

    In one aspect Trump is great for me as it reduces my untouched SIPP.  
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,561 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Be clear that including unused pension pots in IHT liability calculations is one issue.
    Income tax for beneficiaries is another issue.
    The former was announced in the budget and details are being finalised, but not yet known.
    No change to the  latter was mentioned in the budget, although maybe will get changed at some point. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.