We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Calculate inflation
Comments
-
20122013 said:QrizB not 55 yet still great to have another option - will look into it
Edit: may I ask how do you find these information? as I would like to be able to do the same for myself. (may give me a headache but it is ok)Albermarle's is the simplest; it's 40000/0.03.The gilt ladder cost came from https://lategenxer.streamlit.app/Gilt_LadderThe annuity option was using the table from https://www.hl.co.uk/retirement/annuities/best-buy-ratesJimi_man has explained his calculations, I think?N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 33MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!1 -
I am looking at options to utilise the money I have, ideally with lowest risk.The option I can think of is to sell all my S&S ISA and turn it into CASH ISA and put them in a 2 year fixed ISA at 4.1% (no tax or fees to pay I think).If the funds return is about 5% net (not guaranteed) and these are higher risk funds, would it make more sense to have my money in a 2 year fixed Cash ISA account? or would this been eating up by inflation?
I would love to start to investing now but I cannot get my head around investment including looking at the gilt ladder and bond etc Also, because my current S&S ISA could have done better possibly most of the gains have been eaten by the fees.When I start investing, if I take an income every month and leaving the capital, would this beat inflation? I hope to can live off the capital when when i am near the end ...0 -
jimi_man said:20122013 said:QrizB said:20122013 said:QrizB I am sure yours and Albermarle's figures are correct.
As both your figures include investment growth - should the final figure be greater than mine then?No, they should be lower.Over a period of 45 years, 2% of steady growth will turn £1 into £2.44. So, in order to have £40000 in 2070 you'd need to invest £16400 today.The final year of your 45 benefits the most from this, but the same principle applies to every year after the first. The amount you need up-front is less than the amount you get back over time.Note that we've both calculated for £40k gross per year, not £40k net. To calculate the net amount we'd need much more information on your likely income streams and a guess at what tax rates will apply between now and 2070.
My original question was that, if I need £40000 (net) income a year, for the next 45 years and need to factor in at least 3 % inflation, what would be the total amount I need to have ? I did a very basic calculaton of £45000 x 45 years and I would like to include inflation, so I was expecting the final figure will be a lot higher..
There seems to be a bit of a misunderstanding over what you are actually asking. The answer to this question is pretty straightforward maths, if not exactly useful.£40k net is around £47k gross at todays tax rates. So if you wanted £47k every year for 45 years and each year increasing by 3% inflation then this year you'll need £47,000; next year you'll need £48,410; the year after £49,862.... etc etc, all the way to 45 years where you'll need £172,558. So if you add all those yearly figures together you get £4,357,833 which is the sum you need to have now to give you £47k per year for 45 years increasing by 3% each year.
An astronomical figure and not remotely useful since it doesn't take into account any investment return on your £4.35 million. To be able to save £4.35 million in 15 years (your time span) requires you to save about £14,000 a month, increasing by 3% each year and achieving returns of 5%. Few people have the ability to save that much and you don't need to either.
In order to have a pot that gives around £47k per year for the next 45 years is a different proposition and the replies above show you how this works. Using 3% drawdown, then a simple method is to multiply how much you want by 33. So £47k x 33 is around £1.5 million. The idea being that if you had a pot of £1.5 million then each year it's going generate a return. So you take your annual £47k, which leaves you with £1.453 million and then if you added 3% onto it for investment return you end up with £1.496 million. You then take £48,410 next year, add 3% investment return etc etc ... The idea is that you should have nothing left, though that's pretty unlikely.
To get your pot of £1.5 million in 15 years starting from nothing, you'll need to save around £5000 a month, increasing by 3% each year and achieving returns of 5%.
Of course the problems start when you consider that in 15 years £47k at 3% a year inflation will now be £71k, so you then need to alter the figures to achieve that and the whole thing becomes unachievable. Personally I tend to go down the lines of investment returns equals inflation so I work everything out in today's money. The 3% drawdown example above and in other replies above will be ballpark figures and probably won't be far off.
Hope that helps.'In order to have a pot that gives around £47k per year for the next 45 years is a different proposition and the replies above show you how this works. Using 3% drawdown, then a simple method is to multiply how much you want by 33. So £47k x 33 is around £1.5 million.'
I see that 3% is the draw down figure, where does the 33 figure come from? As this may help me to understand how to calculate different scenarios using different numbers, please.
0 -
20122013 said:jimi_man said:20122013 said:QrizB said:20122013 said:QrizB I am sure yours and Albermarle's figures are correct.
As both your figures include investment growth - should the final figure be greater than mine then?No, they should be lower.Over a period of 45 years, 2% of steady growth will turn £1 into £2.44. So, in order to have £40000 in 2070 you'd need to invest £16400 today.The final year of your 45 benefits the most from this, but the same principle applies to every year after the first. The amount you need up-front is less than the amount you get back over time.Note that we've both calculated for £40k gross per year, not £40k net. To calculate the net amount we'd need much more information on your likely income streams and a guess at what tax rates will apply between now and 2070.
My original question was that, if I need £40000 (net) income a year, for the next 45 years and need to factor in at least 3 % inflation, what would be the total amount I need to have ? I did a very basic calculaton of £45000 x 45 years and I would like to include inflation, so I was expecting the final figure will be a lot higher..
There seems to be a bit of a misunderstanding over what you are actually asking. The answer to this question is pretty straightforward maths, if not exactly useful.£40k net is around £47k gross at todays tax rates. So if you wanted £47k every year for 45 years and each year increasing by 3% inflation then this year you'll need £47,000; next year you'll need £48,410; the year after £49,862.... etc etc, all the way to 45 years where you'll need £172,558. So if you add all those yearly figures together you get £4,357,833 which is the sum you need to have now to give you £47k per year for 45 years increasing by 3% each year.
An astronomical figure and not remotely useful since it doesn't take into account any investment return on your £4.35 million. To be able to save £4.35 million in 15 years (your time span) requires you to save about £14,000 a month, increasing by 3% each year and achieving returns of 5%. Few people have the ability to save that much and you don't need to either.
In order to have a pot that gives around £47k per year for the next 45 years is a different proposition and the replies above show you how this works. Using 3% drawdown, then a simple method is to multiply how much you want by 33. So £47k x 33 is around £1.5 million. The idea being that if you had a pot of £1.5 million then each year it's going generate a return. So you take your annual £47k, which leaves you with £1.453 million and then if you added 3% onto it for investment return you end up with £1.496 million. You then take £48,410 next year, add 3% investment return etc etc ... The idea is that you should have nothing left, though that's pretty unlikely.
To get your pot of £1.5 million in 15 years starting from nothing, you'll need to save around £5000 a month, increasing by 3% each year and achieving returns of 5%.
Of course the problems start when you consider that in 15 years £47k at 3% a year inflation will now be £71k, so you then need to alter the figures to achieve that and the whole thing becomes unachievable. Personally I tend to go down the lines of investment returns equals inflation so I work everything out in today's money. The 3% drawdown example above and in other replies above will be ballpark figures and probably won't be far off.
Hope that helps.'In order to have a pot that gives around £47k per year for the next 45 years is a different proposition and the replies above show you how this works. Using 3% drawdown, then a simple method is to multiply how much you want by 33. So £47k x 33 is around £1.5 million.'
I see that 3% is the draw down figure, where does the 33 figure come from? As this may help me to understand how to calculate different scenarios using different numbers, please.1 -
20122013 said:I see that 3% is the draw down figure, where does the 33 figure come from?If you want to draw 3% from a pot, that pot needs to be about 33x aa big as the amount you want to draw.3% of £100k = £3k£3k x 33 = £99k (almost £100k).It's just arithmetic.N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill member.
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 33MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.Not exactly back from my break, but dipping in and out of the forum.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!1 -
-
20122013 said:@ QrizBA sceanrio:If I want to draw 2% from the £100K pot.2% of £100K = £2000 per year£2000 x 22 (??) = 44000?I am still not sure where the '33' come from ? as it is just repat the digit? ie:2% will turn to 22?4% to 44?
Where is Carol Vorderman when you need her?!
TBF the 'x 33.3333' probably didn't help to explain it to you.
The easiest way is to work out your return from a lump sum and then that is what you can roughly take to stay on an even keel.
£100k x 1% = £1,000
£100k x 2% = £2,000
£100k x 3% = £3,000 etc
I'm sure someone will be along in a moment to complicate it further.1 -
Easier example is using 4% that will require 25x the amount. Its 1 divided by the percentage withdrawal to give the multiple needed. So 1 divided by 4% is 25. In Jimi_mans example it would be 1 divided by 3% is 33.33 which he shortened to 33.
1 -
I thought my calc was the simplest (or the one using 0.03 if you calculator doesn't have a % button or you don't know how to use MS Excel).1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards