We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Tips for looking after your health
Comments
-
It is commonly reported in the UK that one in two people will get cancer in their lifetime. Some people say we all have cancerous cells in our body but some people's immunity is better at keeping it under control than others so those people may die with cancerous cells as opposed to dying of cancer.GDB2222 said:
I’m on iron tablets, and I have been long term. If I don’t take them I become anaemic. Why is it inadvisable? Any specific reason, or just a general idea that adjusting diet is better?SarahB16 said:
Hopefully for only a very short time. It is definitely not advisable to take iron tablets long term and far better to increase your iron levels naturally to the required level via food.Murphybear said:
My GP prescribed some iron tablets.
It is also commonly reported that cancer cells require iron to grow so it could be argued why feed those cancerous cells.
However, as with everything in life, it's a trade-off, what do you benefit from taking something versus the risks.
I can only speak for myself and I'm most definitely not giving advice but all I will say is that I personally would never take iron tablets.0 -
I’m low on iron. That’s the cause of my anaemia. So, I need to increase my iron intake one way or another. I’m interested to hear that my cancer risk is lower because of this.SarahB16 said:
It is commonly reported in the UK that one in two people will get cancer in their lifetime. Some people say we all have cancerous cells in our body but some people's immunity is better at keeping it under control than others so those people may die with cancerous cells as opposed to dying of cancer.GDB2222 said:
I’m on iron tablets, and I have been long term. If I don’t take them I become anaemic. Why is it inadvisable? Any specific reason, or just a general idea that adjusting diet is better?SarahB16 said:
Hopefully for only a very short time. It is definitely not advisable to take iron tablets long term and far better to increase your iron levels naturally to the required level via food.Murphybear said:
My GP prescribed some iron tablets.
It is also commonly reported that cancer cells require iron to grow so it could be argued why feed those cancerous cells.
However, as with everything in life, it's a trade-off, what do you benefit from taking something versus the risks.
I can only speak for myself and I'm most definitely not giving advice but all I will say is that I personally would never take iron tablets.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
How is iron in tablet form different from iron in food, in terms of feeding cancer cells?SarahB16 said:
It is also commonly reported that cancer cells require iron to grow so it could be argued why feed those cancerous cells.GDB2222 said:
I’m on iron tablets, and I have been long term. If I don’t take them I become anaemic. Why is it inadvisable? Any specific reason, or just a general idea that adjusting diet is better?SarahB16 said:
Hopefully for only a very short time. It is definitely not advisable to take iron tablets long term and far better to increase your iron levels naturally to the required level via food.Murphybear said:
My GP prescribed some iron tablets.
Plus you mentioned the immune system - prolonged anaemia weakens the immune system (on top of all the other symptoms and potential damage it causes).
https://patient.info/allergies-blood-immune/anaemia-leaflet/iron-deficiency-anaemia#symptoms-of-iron-deficiency-anaemia0 -
Prescribed iron tablets are generally of a higher dose compared to what you would get from your food. Lower dose iron tablets would of course be safer than higher dose iron tablets.Spoonie_Turtle said:
How is iron in tablet form different from iron in food, in terms of feeding cancer cells?
If you wish to research more yourself perhaps take a look on PubMed where the scientific research articles are published.
0 -
SarahB16 said:
Prescribed iron tablets are generally of a higher dose compared to what you would get from your food. Lower dose iron tablets would of course be safer than higher dose iron tablets.Spoonie_Turtle said:
How is iron in tablet form different from iron in food, in terms of feeding cancer cells?
If you wish to research more yourself perhaps take a look on PubMed where the scientific research articles are published.Ferrous sulphate, which is the tablet form usually issued, is poorly absorbed. So, although there’s a lot of iron in the tablets, most of it just goes right through the body.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
According to all the medical research magazines, the NHS and my Haematology lecturer, ferrous sulphate is the best absorbed which is why it is usually prescribedGDB2222 said:SarahB16 said:
Prescribed iron tablets are generally of a higher dose compared to what you would get from your food. Lower dose iron tablets would of course be safer than higher dose iron tablets.Spoonie_Turtle said:
How is iron in tablet form different from iron in food, in terms of feeding cancer cells?
If you wish to research more yourself perhaps take a look on PubMed where the scientific research articles are published.Ferrous sulphate, which is the tablet form usually issued, is poorly absorbed. So, although there’s a lot of iron in the tablets, most of it just goes right through the body.0 -
I don’t think there’s any conflict between the two statements.Murphybear said:
According to all the medical research magazines, the NHS and my Haematology lecturer, ferrous sulphate is the best absorbed which is why it is usually prescribedGDB2222 said:SarahB16 said:
Prescribed iron tablets are generally of a higher dose compared to what you would get from your food. Lower dose iron tablets would of course be safer than higher dose iron tablets.Spoonie_Turtle said:
How is iron in tablet form different from iron in food, in terms of feeding cancer cells?
If you wish to research more yourself perhaps take a look on PubMed where the scientific research articles are published.Ferrous sulphate, which is the tablet form usually issued, is poorly absorbed. So, although there’s a lot of iron in the tablets, most of it just goes right through the body.
Most people absorb plenty of iron from their normal diet, anyway.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

