We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
OAP Pension . Satisfy my curiosity please .
Comments
-
It would seem that the OP would have had some 45 qualifying years at 6/4/16.
He was contracted out for some 36 of those years.
His NSP starting amount was the higher of
Old Rules
NIQY (max 30)/30 x Full Basic SP + (SERPS/S2P - Deduction for Contracting Out)
£119.30 + (SERPS/S2P - Deduction for Contracting Out)
New Rules
(NIQY (max 35)/35 x Full NSP) - Contracted Out Pension Equivalent
£155.65 - COPE
He would have had no SERPS but perhaps some S2P, depending on salary 2002/16.
The DCO/COPE would have been substantial - his starting amount would almost certainly have been given by the old rules calculation.
The OP's starting amount was less than a full NSP at 6/4/16. He was under SPA by some four years. He could only improve his
starting amount by contributions from 6/4/16 to the last full year before he reached SPA.
It would appear that he had around four QY up to SPA which increased his SP but still not to the full amount because of the high COPE
with which he started.
1 -
Marcon said:Dazed_and_C0nfused said:DRS1 said:So he would need another 4 or 5 years to make the pension up to £221.20 pw. But does he actually have any years which are not full? Surely not if he has worked for 50 years continuously up to SPA.0
-
alfmurph said:I am 71 and well retired . Worked from 16 to 66 . At 27 joined lgps and worked their till i retired with a DB pension . I was contracted out for some years last century so my oap is the new pension but i receive less than the full oap by around 110 pounds every 4 weeks .
My question is - I have been told because of the contracted out situation my db pension is increased to make up for this. Is this true .
you & your employer paid lower NI contributions.
That meant your employer had more money available to fund your DB pension.
Had they not had that extra money might of reduced the funding (& thus benefits) of the DB scheme to match or they might of cut pay or just sucked up the costs or closed the scheme & replaced it with aless generous one.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards