MONEY MORAL DILEMMA: Should Britney sell her blood?

isthatreduced

I think buying blood is exploiting the poor and a slippery slope to buying other body parts.

Middlestitch

Yes, why not? Probably better than some alternatives...

daffy1998

. . . five pints at a time!

scabbers

IainCMartin wrote: »

Where do I sign up to be paid ?

Yes, please do tell.

dronid

isthatreduced wrote: »

I think buying blood is exploiting the poor and a slippery slope to buying other body parts.

I suppose it could be seen that way but this, I'm assuming, is a hypothetical scenario. If any company started buying blood for significant amounts of money they'd end up with a significant oversupply problem and I don't think they could afford it.:D

Do remember that those who supply blood may not get monetary gain but do receive a glow of well being and maybe a biscuit and a cup of tea (assuming things haven't changed)! I wonder how many of them would be the 'exploited poor' who would still do it for £100?:D

Magallenic

Yes, why not? It's not illegal.

JayD

Well, assuming Britney is protected by law as to bleeding herself dry ...


I think if she is financially desperate enough, then why not get paid for doing something that she has heretofore done for free?

When needs must and all that.

I am sure she will happily return to giving her blood free to her local hospital if/when she is financially again.

thecraftybear

Absolutley, sell the blood if it's legal and hygienically safe to do so. No point putting your own health at risk for £100, but if it's all safe, then go for it. Where do I sign up?????
:j

juno

scabbers wrote: »

Yes, please do tell.

click here (is based in london)

tallgirld

Yeah she should sell it!!!! Then when she sorts herself out go back to donating it.