We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
St. James' Place - Pensions - Am I stupid for being concerned?
Options
Comments
-
MakeItEasyAndClear said:You are right to be concerned as others have pointed out.
As a holder of a SJP pension, I have just read their charging document today and it says nothing about ongoing charges for holders after six years. It says a lot about in the first six years but there is nothing about after six years. It isn't open about the charges and seems to want to hide them. it may be stated on their website but the information sent out before the annual review says nothing about charges. I am so fed up of stating this to them and if I wasn't near retirement, I would not have my pension with them. This last year growth has been better but in previous years it has been dreadful with 2022 a loss of 9%!! And they dodged that one...I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and should not be seen as financial advice.1 -
MakeItEasyAndClear said:You are right to be concerned as others have pointed out.
As a holder of a SJP pension, I have just read their charging document today and it says nothing about ongoing charges for holders after six years. It says a lot about in the first six years but there is nothing about after six years. It isn't open about the charges and seems to want to hide them. it may be stated on their website but the information sent out before the annual review says nothing about charges. I am so fed up of stating this to them and if I wasn't near retirement, I would not have my pension with them. This last year growth has been better but in previous years it has been dreadful with 2022 a loss of 9%!! And they dodged that one...
SJP were not responsible for that loss. Markets will do what markets do. Individual firms cannot change that.
9% loss that year is not bad. The more cautious you were invested, the higher the loss was.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards