We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Can IHT on pension pot be avoided if I nominate my son as primary beneficiary in Expressions of Wish
Ebkent
Posts: 13 Forumite
If I predecease my husband there will be no IHT on the estate until he dies,
If I nominate my son as sole primary beneficiary of my substantial pension, what is his tax position ?
I assume he would pay income tax , when he draws it, but is it subject to IHT ? As there is no IHT applicable on the1st death of a married couple
0
Comments
-
We don’t know exactly how it will work yet, but it it not going to be that simple, I suspect it will simply use up you NRB in the same way as any other asset currently does.0
-
What do you mean "there is no IHT applicable on the1st death of a married couple"?
Obviously there isn't if everything is left to the surviving spouse because of the spousal exemption, but if left to anyone else of course IHT is potentially applicable. Currently no IHT on pensions but due to change in a couple of years.0 -
How old are you?Ebkent said:If I predecease my husband there will be no IHT on the estate until he dies,If I nominate my son as sole primary beneficiary of my substantial pension, what is his tax position ?I assume he would pay income tax , when he draws it, but is it subject to IHT ? As there is no IHT applicable on the1st death of a married coupleGoogling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0 -
You can't be married to your son, so the spousal exemption cannot apply. I don't see what relevance the spousal exemption has to this situation?Ebkent said:If I predecease my husband there will be no IHT on the estate until he dies,If I nominate my son as sole primary beneficiary of my substantial pension, what is his tax position ?I assume he would pay income tax , when he draws it, but is it subject to IHT ? As there is no IHT applicable on the1st death of a married couple0 -
I am 72, husband is 78. Good health. I understand pensions aren’t within IHT yet. 2027 ?I was just thinking if I named my son as the beneficiary of my pension , and IF I died first, it would bring this inheritance forward as part of my estate. As the rest of it would go to my husband, (IHT free) could my son’s part, the pension , be used agains the NRB, £325k.
I don’t need the income from my Sipp, it being treated as part of my IHT free estate
just a long shot. Trying to mitigate the damage the latest budget made to my IHT planning.0 -
Under current legislation, if you die before the age of 75 and the recipients of your pension pot* are at the discretion of the trustees, neither IHT nor income tax are payable provided that happens within two years of your death.Ebkent said:I am 72, husband is 78. Good health. I understand pensions aren’t within IHT yet. 2027 ?I was just thinking if I named my son as the beneficiary of my pension , and IF I died first, it would bring this inheritance forward as part of my estate. As the rest of it would go to my husband, (IHT free) could my son’s part, the pension , be used agains the NRB, £325k.
just a long shot. Trying to mitigate the damage the latest budget made to my IHT planning.
*You've referred to a 'substantial pension' but not confirmed it is a defined contribution scheme? If it's a defined benefit pension (final salary or CARE), then the rules of the scheme will dictate who receives a survivor's pension - and that'll be your husband, as your son will be too old to qualify as an 'eligible child'. Edit - I see you've now edited your post to confirm it's a SIPP.
It would probably make sense to formalise your plans once the final proposals for 2027 are known.
Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!0 -
What are you trying to achieve? Why would you want the NRB used up on your death when it could be transferred to your husband? I'm struggling to see what you're trying to achieve, your plan might make sense if you wanted to cover the possibility of you dying before IHT on pensions comes into effect, but then the NRB doesn't come into it. You could change it temporarily until the point when IHT on pensions applies. But obviously there's a lot to consider and it seems you either don't understand the rules or aren't explaining well what you're trying to do (or maybe it's just me not following you).0
-
It doesn't make much difference. If you left £325k to your son, then your husband died the next day leaving the rest to him, then yes, he gets the first £325k IHT free, but your husband's NRB is now £325k lower on the second inheritance as he no longer inherits your NRB because you've already used it yourself. Between you, you pay exactly the same total amount of IHT.
Where it could be a good idea, is if your husband expected to withdraw less from your pension than the investment growth after your death. Change the above scenario to your husband dying several years after you, by which time your pension has grown to £500k. In this scenario there is indeed an IHT benefit from having gifted your pension to your son early, but only to the extent that your pension has grown - and always assuming the government hasn't changed the NRB in the meantime.0 -
Although you don’t need the money perhaps, if you not a HR tax payer and you are not going to need it if your spouse dies first, you should start to draw some income from it and pass it on as gifts from excess income.Ebkent said:I am 72, husband is 78. Good health. I understand pensions aren’t within IHT yet. 2027 ?I was just thinking if I named my son as the beneficiary of my pension , and IF I died first, it would bring this inheritance forward as part of my estate. As the rest of it would go to my husband, (IHT free) could my son’s part, the pension , be used agains the NRB, £325k.
I don’t need the income from my Sipp, it being treated as part of my IHT free estate
just a long shot. Trying to mitigate the damage the latest budget made to my IHT planning.0 -
How much do you draw from your SIPP at present and how much other taxable income do you have each year?Ebkent said:
I don’t need the income from my Sipp, it being treated as part of my IHT free estate
just a long shot. Trying to mitigate the damage the latest budget made to my IHT planning.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

