We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
'excluded occupier' or not?

FlorayG
Posts: 2,056 Forumite

If someone has sole use of someone else's house and has a tenancy agreement that says they pay £50 a month but they are not actually ever asked to pay it - does that make them an excluded occupier because they don't pay anything or is it a proper tenancy because the agreement says £600 a year?
0
Comments
-
London or not? If London it cannot be (legally) an AST (min £1000 pa ) -but it's a tenancy so they are tenants .
If not London it's an AST (min £250pa) so AST tenants.
Have they been served a notice of an address in England or Wales for the London? If not no rent due (but becomes due when address provided).
Entirely not logical.
0 -
theartfullodger said:London or not? If London it cannot be (legally) an AST (min £1000 pa ) -but it's a tenancy so they are tenants .
If not London it's an AST (min £250pa) so AST tenants.
So even though she doesn't actually pay any rent, the tenancy agreement covers that? (There are other issues so please just answer on this point)0 -
Ianal (I am not a lawyer) but imho yes. But check with the experts at Shelter.
Agent/landlord probably won't understand. (To be an agent or landlord in England requires no qualifications, no training, no criminal records check - they could be any clown , and often are.
)0 -
theartfullodger said:To be an agent or landlord in England requires no qualifications, no training, no criminal records check - they could be any clown0
-
Grumpy_chap said:theartfullodger said:To be an agent or landlord in England requires no qualifications, no training, no criminal records check - they could be any clown
UK wide?? Not united, not my king.....
Other countries do this better: For example Scotland requires landlords to at least be registered - anyone (ANYONE) can look up who is the registered landlord of a property, 24x7, for free.
https://www.landlordregistrationscotland.gov.uk/search
And look up, free, 24x7, who (agent, landlord, tenant) had cases found involving them... Can be very informative...
https://housingandpropertychamber.scot/previous-tribunal-decisions
Come on England, catch up!!! (i'm still a landlord, but no longer one in scotland - problems with my age (77), health and distance... no complaints, happy to be still going!)
Best wishes to all..0 -
Can any clown still register as LL in Scotland? Or is the registration a meaningful quality control?0
-
Grumpy_chap said:Can any clown still register as LL in Scotland? Or is the registration a meaningful quality control?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards