
We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Are we expecting the BOE Base Rate to drop to 4.25% on 8th May?
Comments
-
Some of you may think stock prices have nothing to do with where mortgage rates are going.
Today's price action in tech stocks is potentially the start of Main St (and MSM) waking up to hype<>growth and a crash in consumer confidence.
Likely to be met however - EVENTUALLY - with more central bank 'magic money' and even more asset inflation (you just may not have a job).To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.
Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.
No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.0 -
I do think that they will lower rates by 0.25% in February despite not agreeing with the move.0
-
IAMIAM said:la531983 said:IAMIAM said:Don's say that mortgage due in June, and do not fancy securing a fix rate at 4.4% just yet!
However, what's public perception if the base rate dropped? That mortgage rates will drop, and lenders that don't drop rates are profiteering. Those lenders who need to drum up a bit more business drop rates - not directly in response to the base rate, but to market forces.
Conversely an increase in base rate is a reasonable excuse for lenders to increase rates and make more money.
It's a bit like petrol prices in response to oil market prices. If oil prices decrease, retailers do eventually pass on the decrease, but only if market forces (competition) makes them do it to retain market share. Of course, when oil prices increase retailers have no hesitation putting petrol prices up.0 -
Strummer22 said:
Conversely an increase in base rate is a reasonable excuse for lenders to increase rates and make more money.0 -
Financial hysteresis - and that is why financial modelling is just guesswork, it is a system for which no one knows the control law.
Poor lenders, poor petrol companies! But they always seem to win
0 -
Consumer debt continues to expand as BoE continues to loosen policy to accommodate lower productivity despite above target inflation and positive real wages benefitting asset holders vs renters (old vs young).
Meanwhile, unemployment remains near historic lows (albeit ppl aren't being productive).
Why is the BoE doing this? Unless you get money into the hands of those who will spend vs invest then you will not increase GDP by cutting rates.
Expect this merry-go-round to continue.
If you want to increase growth, do not incentivise ppl to invest in pre-existing property - it is not a productive use of capital to invest in pre-existing housing. Literally billions of newly created £ are issued every year to buy something which already exists.
That is new capital which banks should be incentivised/ allocating to improving UK productivity.
Why not reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing homes?
To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.
Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.
No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.0 -
lojo1000 said:Consumer debt continues to expand as BoE continues to loosen policy to accommodate lower productivity despite above target inflation and positive real wages benefitting asset holders vs renters (old vs young).
Meanwhile, unemployment remains near historic lows (albeit ppl aren't being productive).
Why is the BoE doing this? Unless you get money into the hands of those who will spend vs invest then you will not increase GDP by cutting rates.
Expect this merry-go-round to continue.
If you want to increase growth, do not incentivise ppl to invest in pre-existing property - it is not a productive use of capital to invest in pre-existing housing. Literally billions of newly created £ are issued every year to buy something which already exists.
That is new capital which banks should be incentivised/ allocating to improving UK productivity.
Why not reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing homes?
Adding an incentive to new builds could also work, if demand for new builds was higher then developers would build them faster.0 -
Strummer22 said:lojo1000 said:Consumer debt continues to expand as BoE continues to loosen policy to accommodate lower productivity despite above target inflation and positive real wages benefitting asset holders vs renters (old vs young).
Meanwhile, unemployment remains near historic lows (albeit ppl aren't being productive).
Why is the BoE doing this? Unless you get money into the hands of those who will spend vs invest then you will not increase GDP by cutting rates.
Expect this merry-go-round to continue.
If you want to increase growth, do not incentivise ppl to invest in pre-existing property - it is not a productive use of capital to invest in pre-existing housing. Literally billions of newly created £ are issued every year to buy something which already exists.
That is new capital which banks should be incentivised/ allocating to improving UK productivity.
Why not reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing homes?
Adding an incentive to new builds could also work, if demand for new builds was higher then developers would build them faster.
To solve inequality and failing productivity, cap leverage allowed to be used in property transactions. This lowers the ROI on housing, reduces monetary demand for housing, reduces house prices bringing them more into line with wage growth as opposed to debt expansion.
Reduce stamp duty on new builds and increase stamp duty on pre-existing property.
No-one should have control of setting interest rates since it only adds to uncertainty. Let the markets price yields, credit and labour.0 -
Base rate cut by 0.25% to 4.5%. Interesting to note that two of the nine committee members voted for a 0.5% cut (the rest for 0.25%). This strongly indicates another cut either in March or May, barring unexpected economic data.
The BoE predicts headline CPI inflation to rise to 3.7% in 2025 Q3 before falling again, but apparently thinks this is transient, won't increase underlying domestic inflationary pressures, and shouldn't hinder the plan to cut rates. Who knows how that'll all pan out?1 -
It's all guesswork:1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards