Pension redress

Hello
I would like to know if anybody on here has under gone a pension redress calculation and then successfully challenged it when it was found to have been fraudulent to avoid payment of redress. My partner has decided she wants to challenge a calculation  completed via conguent software. I know there are many cases of ifas using this software and incorrectly calculating the redress figures, has this happened to anyone on here and if so what steps did you take to rectify the issue.

Comments

  • sandsy
    sandsy Posts: 1,750 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What makes you think the calculation is not correct? 

    You should receive a report that shows all of the information that was used in the calculation (the inputs). Are any of the inputs obviously wrong? If not, what else is it that makes you think it is wrong?

    Presume this is for a pension transfer from defined benefit to defined contribution? Many pension transfer redress calculations are coming out as low/zero at the moment due to the economic conditions.

    You might find it helpful to read this:

    https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/pension-transfer-defined-benefit/redress-calculations

  • notabot66
    notabot66 Posts: 19 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    She is aware of all the facts. However the calculation failed to include numerous benefits which were well known and would have resulted in redress.
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 13,807 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 16 January at 9:31AM
    notabot66 said:
    She is aware of all the facts. However the calculation failed to include numerous benefits which were well known and would have resulted in redress.
    'Well known' is not the same thing as 'in the rules of the scheme in question'. Do you mean discretionary benefits?  Could you give a couple of examples of these 'numerous well known benefits' please?
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • notabot66
    notabot66 Posts: 19 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    No,
    They were benefits confirmed by both the trustees and actuary who manages the scheme.
  • notabot66
    notabot66 Posts: 19 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    It was a deliberate action to avoid payment. It is not an unusual tactic by unscrupulous ifas.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.