We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IFA wants to increase charge on existing pension
Comments
-
My IFA keeps offering me 2 weeks in his villa in the Bahamas with travel there in his private jet.
I have to keep turning him down.0 -
westv said:My IFA keeps offering me 2 weeks in his villa in the Bahamas with travel there in his private jet.
I have to keep turning him down.
..
"All lies and jest, still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest”0 -
At 1%, the IFA should be referred to Arkell v Pressdram.2
-
Y'all make it sound like The Old Boys Network, except you're paying.Fashion on the Ration
2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
2025 - 62/891 -
Just the one each?[Deleted User] said:I paid for a short taxi journey with four IFAs - they all asked for a receipt."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius1 -
And no corporate governance procedures it seems be we knew that already.cfw1994 said:
It’s evening meal overnight in the Cotswolds for my pal….SJP still have cash to splash, it appears 🫣wjr4 said:IFAs rarely take people out to lunch now, I find the idea of that very outdated. If you don’t understand that you’re paying the annual fee for, question it.
It will come back to haunt them."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0 -
A few years ago I did some work helping an SJP-like organisation to help them understand the risks that they were running with their financial advisers. Despite the contract being a personal one between the organisation and the individual FA, it turns out that some were trading as general partnerships with their spouse (two personal allowances, two deductions for phone / laptop / car). Some were meeting clients in the US (two lots of travel deductions). Their leads were provided by the SJP-like organisations but it seemed that quite a few thought it a good idea to pay a company (literally) owned by their mum, a large amount (e.g. £60k pa) for "marketing services".You have pretty much described most small limited companies in all walks of life.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
I do not think there is any issue in any business, if they choose to entertain clients .kinger101 said:
And no corporate governance procedures it seems be we knew that already.cfw1994 said:
It’s evening meal overnight in the Cotswolds for my pal….SJP still have cash to splash, it appears 🫣wjr4 said:IFAs rarely take people out to lunch now, I find the idea of that very outdated. If you don’t understand that you’re paying the annual fee for, question it.
It will come back to haunt them.
In fact the tax system is quite benign on the subject. When I used to claim expenses, if I bought a meal for a colleague, I could not claim the VAT back. However is it was a meal related to business i.e. with a customer or supplier, then you can claim the VAT back ( or more correctly your employer can ) .0 -
You have pretty much described most small limited companies in all walks of life.
That is an unwarrented generalisation on small businesses IMO. It may be (though I hope not) commonly encountered in financial service situations, but it certainly isn't more general from my experience.
0 -
Spouses and family members are extremely common in officer positions or roles "on paper" like cleaner or admin.LHW99 said:You have pretty much described most small limited companies in all walks of life.That is an unwarrented generalisation on small businesses IMO. It may be (though I hope not) commonly encountered in financial service situations, but it certainly isn't more general from my experience.
I see it frequently when doing AML checks on the company and beneficial owners. Most common is just the spouse but often enough it includes the children and sometimes their spouses too.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

