We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Financial Protection of Personal Pensions vs SIPPS in event of company failure.

Hello I have an underperforming pension I would like to transfer but am unclear as to which direction to take -Personal Pension or SIPP. The value is around £200k so above the FCS limit of £85k. What is the safest route for me to take or am I worrying unnecessarily? Is the position different if I use a broker intermediary such as Interactive Investor. Thanks.

Comments

  • Cus
    Cus Posts: 695 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    This has come up before. Generally it's what you have invested in, not the wrapper company, that matters.  The 85k is normally not a worry.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 25,578 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    As long as you stick to mainstream providers there is very little to worry about.
    Couple of other points
    - Interactive Investor is a well known SIPP provider.
    - More importantly your current pension maybe performing poorly, because it is invested wrongly. Just changing pension providers is not a magic solution, as it is the investments within the pensions that bring the good or bad performance.
    Have you considered changing the investments in your current pension? ( you may well have, but many do not)
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 12,726 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    anjo56 said:
    Hello I have an underperforming pension I would like to transfer but am unclear as to which direction to take -Personal Pension or SIPP. The value is around £200k so above the FCS limit of £85k. What is the safest route for me to take or am I worrying unnecessarily? Is the position different if I use a broker intermediary such as Interactive Investor. Thanks.
    From your post, I think you might not have read this: https://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/pensions/
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 118,444 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The value is around £200k so above the FCS limit of £85k
    What makes you think your FSCS limit is £85k.  Many pensions have 100% FSCS protection with no upper limit.  Others have no FSCS protection (or virtually none).

    What is the safest route for me to take or am I worrying unnecessarily?
    Probably worrying necessarily as in most cases, FSCS protection is unlikely to be used but if you decide to go away from the mainstream and use loss making providers or fund houses, then maybe it is worth considering.

     Is the position different if I use a broker intermediary such as Interactive Investor.
    II is not an intermediary.    Intermedieres are IFAs.     Using an intermediary does give additional consumer protection as you get the advice given protection.  DIY doesn't give you that.    However, the rest is the same.




    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 240.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.4K Life & Family
  • 253.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.