We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
DB Pension/ DC Pension & Recycling
Comments
-
Thank you and the other posters for replying. I’ve read through the HMRC post you kindly provided and I’m still unsure if increasing my salary sacrifice contribution to offset my new DB monthly payment is recycling or not .zagfles said:NedS said:GallacPT said:Hi everyone, new here and looking for advice.Recently taken a DB Pension from previous employer including 25% tax free .
intend to continue working and increase my salary sacrifice contribution into my current employers DC scheme to offset the DB pension monthly payment .
i know MPAA doesn’t effect DB schemes but what I’m unsure off is would this be seen as recycling?I’m not putting any of the tax free lump sum into the DC scheme I’m only trying to save more for when I actually retire.
advice grateful received .I’ve approached a tax advisor by email for a written statement of compliance but heard nothing back as of yet .I’d be grateful for your opinion- is my plan to offset my DB monthly pension payment by increasing my salary sacrifice contribution recycling ?
Thank you0 -
Thank you all for responding to my thread .0
-
So by me substituting the amount I take home each month aka reduced salary (by increasing salary sacrifice)+ db pension payment . So therefore offsetting to increase DC pension for future use in retirement and not using any of my lump sum to increase my DC pension I’m not recycling because I’m actually spending my DB monthly payment in lieu of salary.GunJack said:It's the fact you're not using the pcls to up your contribution, you're using the pension income - that's the distinction that makes it not recyclingIs that correct?Thank you0 -
If the amount of additional contributions is less than 30% of the tax free cash you have taken then I believe it is not considered as recycling.I don't care about your first world problems; I have enough of my own!1
-
I've been trying to look a bit deeper into this, and it appears that terminology may be an important distinction.....
Taking a tax free lump sum of 25% from a DC does seem to apply to the recycling rules, but a PCLS from a DB may or may not be covered....could any of the IFAs on here clarify this? If a DB PCLS could come under recycling then it could change my plans....
Reading through the manual linked to earlier would appear that those of us with DB income starting can increase salsac by the level of the DB income irrespective of the 30% rule as it's from income and not the PCLS.........Gettin' There, Wherever There is......
I have a dodgy "i" key, so ignore spelling errors due to "i" issues, ...I blame Apple
1 -
I have no idea of the exact HMRC rules, but maybe they could argue that it is not possible to be clear whether your increased DC contributions are coming from the DB income, or from the PCLS?GunJack said:I've been trying to look a bit deeper into this, and it appears that terminology may be an important distinction.....
Taking a tax free lump sum of 25% from a DC does seem to apply to the recycling rules, but a PCLS from a DB may or may not be covered....could any of the IFAs on here clarify this? If a DB PCLS could come under recycling then it could change my plans....
Reading through the manual linked to earlier would appear that those of us with DB income starting can increase salsac by the level of the DB income irrespective of the 30% rule as it's from income and not the PCLS...1 -
These re cycling questions keep coming up and as far as.I know no contributor to this forum has ever been penalised for recycling their tax free pension payment. I received a DB pension when I was 50 and added the whole of the monthly income to my work DC pension and spent the lump sum on paying of my mortgage. If ever I was investigated I would argue that the lump sum was used for a legitimate pre planned purpose and that my increased contributions were from pension income. It all seems so nuanced and complicated that I can see why no one ( as far as we are aware) has actually been penalised in the last 10 years or so.1
-
What makes you think PCLS from DB and DC are treated differently for recycling rules?GunJack said:I've been trying to look a bit deeper into this, and it appears that terminology may be an important distinction.....
Taking a tax free lump sum of 25% from a DC does seem to apply to the recycling rules, but a PCLS from a DB may or may not be covered....could any of the IFAs on here clarify this? If a DB PCLS could come under recycling then it could change my plans....
Reading through the manual linked to earlier would appear that those of us with DB income starting can increase salsac by the level of the DB income irrespective of the 30% rule as it's from income and not the PCLS...0 -
I’ve also read somewhere that a PCLS from an DB may be looked at differently if it’s not optional. For example I have a DB payable at 60 where the lump sum is baked into the pension. If I happened to be working that year* it would be inconvenient to have to stop paying as much as possible into a SIPP just to avoid an impression of recycling. I’m not actively taking the PCLS with the intention of recycling it - one of the tests is intention.zagfles said:
What makes you think PCLS from DB and DC are treated differently for recycling rules?GunJack said:I've been trying to look a bit deeper into this, and it appears that terminology may be an important distinction.....
Taking a tax free lump sum of 25% from a DC does seem to apply to the recycling rules, but a PCLS from a DB may or may not be covered....could any of the IFAs on here clarify this? If a DB PCLS could come under recycling then it could change my plans....
Reading through the manual linked to earlier would appear that those of us with DB income starting can increase salsac by the level of the DB income irrespective of the 30% rule as it's from income and not the PCLS...
* I’m not planning to be working that year. Just thought I’d get that in there, apparently I mention my impending retirement quite a bit at work….Fashion on the Ration
2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
2025 - 62/890 -
I asked this question in the past and I was told that HMRC is just using the term PCLS to refer to any tax free cash withdrawal coming from a pension. As someone mentioned above, if the PCLS was mandatory and you had no choice but to take it, this might create additional arguments.GunJack said:I've been trying to look a bit deeper into this, and it appears that terminology may be an important distinction.....
Taking a tax free lump sum of 25% from a DC does seem to apply to the recycling rules, but a PCLS from a DB may or may not be covered....could any of the IFAs on here clarify this? If a DB PCLS could come under recycling then it could change my plans....
Reading through the manual linked to earlier would appear that those of us with DB income starting can increase salsac by the level of the DB income irrespective of the 30% rule as it's from income and not the PCLS...
As others have stated there is no recycling issue with putting your taxable DB pension income into your pension as it is not tax free money.
(I suppose it could come into question if for example you went part time working at the same time as doing this, and your part time earnings was insufficient to cover your living expenses, but up to now it doesn't seem like HMRC investigates these type of things for indivdual tax payers, probably because they would have to show that it was recycling and this would get quite time consuming for them to prove).1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

