Pension charges Vs performance

Hi everyone! Can you help, I'm terrible with numbers....

How do I know whether I'm paying too much for my pension charges/fees, or whether my advisor has positioned my investment optimally (I realise this is subjective, but surely there are some indications a layperson can use)?

For some reason I've got 2 SIPPS with AEGON (I realise I should understand why this is, but I don't). One has ~£60k where I'm being charged an "Annual charge (monthly)" of 0.22% and an "Ongoing adviser charge (monthly)" of 1.00%. The other has ~£220k where I'm being charged an "Annual charge (monthly)" of 0.22%, an "Ongoing adviser charge (monthly)" of 1.00%, and a "Ongoing DFM charge" of 0.15%.

If I look at the Product Report for 23/24 it's showing a cumulative return of 17.06% and 18.92% respectively - which sounds great. However the 'Other key values section' shows Investment Income of ~£1k, against Platform, Adviser and DFM Charges totalling ~£3.5k - which sounds terrible (I suspect I'm misunderstanding the Investment Income value).

Is this good? What kind of cumulative returns should be expected? 

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 27,210 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Firstly for both SIPPs, the charge you see is most likely just for the platform that administers the pension.
    The investments you hold in those SIPPs will have their own charges. You do not see these explicitly as they are paid internally by the investment fund.
    The advisor fee of 1 % for a £60K SIPP is low, if that was a standalone SIPP.
    The advisor fee for a £200K SIPP could normally be 0.75% to 1 % . However the lower figure would be fairer as they have delegated some of the work to a DFM.
    In reality you have £260K and 0.75% would be a fairer fee in my opinion.
    So your total fee for the bigger one is 
    0.22% + 1 % + 0.15% + investment charges ( you need to clarify what these are with the advisor as they can vary a lot)

     What kind of cumulative returns should be expected? 

    It completely depends on the type of investments held. During your initial discussions with the IFA , your objectives and risk tolerance would have been discussed and appropriate investments chosen.
    Some people have a high risk tolerance, so will go for long term growth, knowing there could be some big bumps in the road. Others prefer to live with more modest growth with a  more safety first approach. Your age/how near retirement can affect the choices as well.

  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 13,854 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Hi everyone! Can you help, I'm terrible with numbers....

    How do I know whether I'm paying too much for my pension charges/fees, or whether my advisor has positioned my investment optimally (I realise this is subjective, but surely there are some indications a layperson can use)?

    For some reason I've got 2 SIPPS with AEGON (I realise I should understand why this is, but I don't). One has ~£60k where I'm being charged an "Annual charge (monthly)" of 0.22% and an "Ongoing adviser charge (monthly)" of 1.00%. The other has ~£220k where I'm being charged an "Annual charge (monthly)" of 0.22%, an "Ongoing adviser charge (monthly)" of 1.00%, and a "Ongoing DFM charge" of 0.15%.

    If I look at the Product Report for 23/24 it's showing a cumulative return of 17.06% and 18.92% respectively - which sounds great. However the 'Other key values section' shows Investment Income of ~£1k, against Platform, Adviser and DFM Charges totalling ~£3.5k - which sounds terrible (I suspect I'm misunderstanding the Investment Income value).

    Is this good? What kind of cumulative returns should be expected? 
    You might be terrible with numbers, but you're paying for advice from someone who should be good with them: your adviser. Have you asked them?
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • Thanks Albermarle, that's useful. I'll bring it up at my next review
  • Hey Marcon, thanks for the suggestion, but when you're buying a product off someone, asking them whether their fees are reasonable, or whether it's a good product, seems a little naïve. Maybe that's just me being paranoid.
  • IvanOpinion
    IvanOpinion Posts: 22,543 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks Albermarle, that's useful. I'll bring it up at my next review
    Why wait for the next review? Unless that is imminent then talk to your advisor now, that is what you are paying them for. See if you can negotiate the rates down a bit, the advisor fee seems a bit high for a £250-300K portfolio (I assume it is the same advisor covering both).
    Past caring about first world problems.
  • Hey Marcon, thanks for the suggestion, but when you're buying a product off someone, asking them whether their fees are reasonable, or whether it's a good product, seems a little naïve. Maybe that's just me being paranoid.
    I think you’re asking them what they’re doing to earn their fee. It’s a slightly different question. Some FA companies are facing claims because they haven’t been performing the services they claim to.
    Fashion on the Ration
    2024 - 43/66 coupons used, carry forward 23
    2025 - 60.5/89
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 256K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.