Loan application rejected, credit report wrong

Hi. Just wondered if anyone had advise or experience on this. After doing various eligibility checkers I was receiving 90% chance of loan. I did the application and it was rejected - thought that was odd so logged into Experian.

My credit file was blank as it didn't have my current address (almost 3 years here) - there was literally no activity history. So I updated that and Experian has refreshed today putting me in the Good sector.

The loan provider said it used Experian to reach its decision so just wondered will the reject be due to the above issue. If so do I apply again (but that creates another item on the report). Or is it more sophisticated than that and it was a genuine rejection?

TIA

Comments

  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 17,147 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Your best off speaking to the lender in question, especially as you dont say the timescales involved. Some lenders accept appeals on their lending decisions and that might be easier. Some automatically reject additional applications from the same person if within X days/weeks/months. 

    Its not uncommon for lenders to do more than one check and so generally if there are two from the same lender in close succession lenders will just assume its all really one application. How close will vary by lender
  • Your best off speaking to the lender in question, especially as you dont say the timescales involved. Some lenders accept appeals on their lending decisions and that might be easier. Some automatically reject additional applications from the same person if within X days/weeks/months. 

    Its not uncommon for lenders to do more than one check and so generally if there are two from the same lender in close succession lenders will just assume its all really one application. How close will vary by lender
    Thanks. Was Tesco Bank and they say not to reapply within 3 months.
  • I had an issue with Tesco Bank a few years ago, similarly it was due to experian being incorrect. I appealed, sent them the proof of the errors, issued a notice of correction to experian.  Tesco then ran it through transunion and i got accepted.
  • It definitely sounds like the blank credit file with the old address was the main issue! Lenders look for stability and recent credit activity, so with no history at your current address, they likely saw it as a risk and rejected it.

    Now that Experian is updated and your score looks good, you're in a better spot. You could try reaching out to the lender and explaining the situation—they might be able to reconsider without a new application. If they’re not open to that, maybe wait a few weeks before reapplying, just so it fully reflects on their end.

    Or, another option is to try a different lender (or even talk to a broker), who could point you to ones that are more lenient in cases like this. Now that your profile is up to date, you’re definitely set up better for the next try!
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,409 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It definitely sounds like the blank credit file with the old address was the main issue! Lenders look for stability and recent credit activity, so with no history at your current address, they likely saw it as a risk and rejected it.

    Now that Experian is updated and your score looks good, you're in a better spot. You could try reaching out to the lender and explaining the situation—they might be able to reconsider without a new application. If they’re not open to that, maybe wait a few weeks before reapplying, just so it fully reflects on their end.

    Or, another option is to try a different lender (or even talk to a broker), who could point you to ones that are more lenient in cases like this. Now that your profile is up to date, you’re definitely set up better for the next try!
    Credit scores are not a thing in the UK

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.