We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

State Pension rise 2024/2025 story

1235»

Comments

  • I don’t have access to this story but guess it is to do with my question when I started this thread. Does anyone have the entire story it links to?

    Paddle No 21:wave:
  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,679 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,136 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Those of us who deal or dealt with sensitive information were told of the classification of the information when it was released to us. If it were confidential then we would keep it so. Governments and the civil service departments have never, seemingly, been constrained by such controls.
    I don't think the triple lock using salary increases this year is sensitive information that needs to be kept secret. Its obvious to anyone who understands the triple lock
  • pinnks
    pinnks Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I agree and with the latest CPI and Earnings figures being about 2.5% apart, it doesn't take a genius to speculate what the next data releases will show and to then create some click-bate, especially when you look at the house from which it originates...  

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 19,474 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The biggest thing this story really demonstrates is the Triple Lock resulting in the SP increase "double-dipping" as it rises first for inflation and again for the lagging wage rises, yet those earning a wage only see one increase in the cycle.
  • DBdoobydoo
    DBdoobydoo Posts: 157 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 8 September 2024 at 7:46AM
    The biggest thing this story really demonstrates is the Triple Lock resulting in the SP increase "double-dipping" as it rises first for inflation and again for the lagging wage rises, yet those earning a wage only see one increase in the cycle.
    This is by design so over time the value of the state pension ratchets up so ending pensioner poverty. Unfortunately when introduced no end point was identified it will be politically difficult to abandon the triple lock.
    An equitable solution would be to set a target of a fixed percentage of median income then once this was reached via the triple lock the annual increase could be set as CPI alone to maintain the purchasing power of the pension. The actual percentage of median income is open to debate. Currently median income is around £35K so with full new SP around £11.5K it's just under 33%. Raising it to 35% would give a pension of £12.25K while 40% would be £14K


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.