Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING:
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour.
Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Purple Bricks' Lifetime Guarantee
Comments
-
What did the terms and conditions say? Not the advert, the actual contract.0
-
As the company you were with closed down. In a word nothing you can do, unless it was a insurance (3rd party) backed scheme.
At least you have 6 months before being charged with the new owners, which is better than the, sorry but that offered ended when they went bust.Life in the slow lane0 -
Did they? I thought it was a solvent takeover including ongoing contracts.born_again said:As the company you were with closed down. In a word nothing you can do, unless it was a insurance (3rd party) backed scheme.
At least you have 6 months before being charged with the new owners, which is better than the, sorry but that offered ended when they went bust.
Or have they since dissolved?
0 -
BarelySentientAI said:
Did they? I thought it was a solvent takeover including ongoing contracts.born_again said:As the company you were with closed down. In a word nothing you can do, unless it was a insurance (3rd party) backed scheme.
At least you have 6 months before being charged with the new owners, which is better than the, sorry but that offered ended when they went bust.
Or have they since dissolved?Purplebricks, the once high-flying online estate agent, has been sold to Strike for £1 with more than 750 jobs at risk.
The struggling company had put itself up for sale after revealing it expects to lose between £15-£20m this year. The group’s potential may be better realised under an “alternative ownership structure,” according to the company’s statement.
https://thenegotiator.co.uk/news/purplebricks-final-death-throes-revealed-including-66p-share-offer/
Life in the slow lane0 -
Purple Bricks was delisted from the stock Exchange and sold to a private company for £1. New owners new terms.0
-
Well yes, I was aware they had been sold - but that doesn't (contrary to Hoenir's suggestion) automatically void all existing contracts.born_again said:BarelySentientAI said:
Did they? I thought it was a solvent takeover including ongoing contracts.born_again said:As the company you were with closed down. In a word nothing you can do, unless it was a insurance (3rd party) backed scheme.
At least you have 6 months before being charged with the new owners, which is better than the, sorry but that offered ended when they went bust.
Or have they since dissolved?Purplebricks, the once high-flying online estate agent, has been sold to Strike for £1 with more than 750 jobs at risk.
The struggling company had put itself up for sale after revealing it expects to lose between £15-£20m this year. The group’s potential may be better realised under an “alternative ownership structure,” according to the company’s statement.
https://thenegotiator.co.uk/news/purplebricks-final-death-throes-revealed-including-66p-share-offer/
Administration would, but that sale doesn't seem to have involved administration. Similarly if they'd just sold the rights to the name, but it wasn't that either.
Having done a bit more research - The sale to Strike reportedly included much of the assets and liabilities, before what was left of the company was liquidated. I wouldn't expect the OP's contract to have been left in the liquidated section.0 -
I'm not a business person, but I believe it depends on whether the sale was a share sale or an asset sale.
In a share sale, the new owner takes on responsibility for (and can be held to) existing contracts.
In an asset sale, the new owner will not automatically take on such responsibility. However, the contracts can be assigned to the new owner through a process. Which may or may not happen.
E.g. https://legalvision.co.uk/business-sale-purchase/share-sale-vs-asset-sale/
I'm not sure (and don't have time to track it down) whether the sale of PurpleBricks to Strike was a share sale or assets sale, but a few reports of the sale mention 'assets', strike having 'bought the assets' etc. Also, no mention of any contracts being transferred.
But, I haven't done enough due diligence to be anywhere near knowing the real situation. I only post because I think what's upthread is a bit ambiguous because it doesn't mention the type of sale.0 -
Surprised me to be honest given that they make money from cross selling.
0 -
The current main trading entity (according to their website) appears to be Purplebricks Property Limited, which was only incorporated last year. It would help if the OP told us the company details of whoever they contracted with, but I would guess it's a company which is no longer solvent.
1 -
Anyone know if there is any way of challenging this or getting our money back?
Regardless of the legal niceties ( as debated above), there is nothing to stop you challenging it.
Could be this is just an opening gambit and if you complain they might extend it to 12 months, or offer a 25% refund or whatever.
I would start by just saying it is very unfair, and £1700 is a lot of money for you etc etc. They can only say no, and then you can decide whether you want to take it further. Presumably will be others in the same position and there might be something in the news/consumer programme at some point.
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

