We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
25% bonkers ruling
pinkerton_angel
Posts: 92 Forumite
Anyone else get done over every year by this? It's not the ruling itself, it's that they only apply it when it suits them.
So annual review should be the latest figure they have from HMRC. Every year they give me the wrong calculation as they don't include the P11D figure. Every year I tell them that they should and every year they tell me they can't as it's not more than 25%
It drives me utterly insane. I've been to tribunal over this and was ruled that CMS were calculating payments incorrectly and included a lot of backpay, so much so, my ex husband now volunteers his P11D information to me when they get it wrong (and we're not on the best of terms)
This morning it's happened again. I will send off my MR, which will be rejected, and again go to tribunal. I've involved my MP who was useless.
Why don't they have any common sense??
So annual review should be the latest figure they have from HMRC. Every year they give me the wrong calculation as they don't include the P11D figure. Every year I tell them that they should and every year they tell me they can't as it's not more than 25%
It drives me utterly insane. I've been to tribunal over this and was ruled that CMS were calculating payments incorrectly and included a lot of backpay, so much so, my ex husband now volunteers his P11D information to me when they get it wrong (and we're not on the best of terms)
This morning it's happened again. I will send off my MR, which will be rejected, and again go to tribunal. I've involved my MP who was useless.
Why don't they have any common sense??
A&L charges WON - Barclaycard charges WON - MBNAx3 charges WON - Halifax charges WON
Still fighting: Next/Cabot default - Littlewoods/NDR default
Still fighting: Next/Cabot default - Littlewoods/NDR default
1
Comments
-
Perhaps you should ask the Parliamentary Ombudsman to get involved.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.1
-
Thank you, I didn't know such a thing existed. I've just done this.tacpot12 said:Perhaps you should ask the Parliamentary Ombudsman to get involved.A&L charges WON - Barclaycard charges WON - MBNAx3 charges WON - Halifax charges WON
Still fighting: Next/Cabot default - Littlewoods/NDR default0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards