PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Solicitor held my money for 20 years should I get interest on top of the capital amount

Options
My solicitors who acted in conveyance for me in a sale of my property just contacted me. 
They found they had accidentally withheld a significant amount of money on my file/account - unbeknown to me.   They rang me to ask for my details to pay me the amount.   After confirming it was the solicitors and not a scam they took my details to reimburse me.   My question is should they be paying interest on my funds they have held for 20 years 
thanks in advance 
«13456715

Comments

  • Alderbank
    Alderbank Posts: 3,902 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My solicitors who acted in conveyance for me in a sale of my property just contacted me. 
    They found they had accidentally withheld a significant amount of money on my file/account - unbeknown to me.   They rang me to ask for my details to pay me the amount.   After confirming it was the solicitors and not a scam they took my details to reimburse me.   My question is should they be paying interest on my funds they have held for 20 years 
    thanks in advance 
    Welcome to the forum.

    The short answer is Yes.

    This is about the SRA's  infamous Rule 7, which says that solicitors must pay a 'fair' rate of interest on clients' accounts.

    I am sure they will do this, especially over such a long period. When you finally get your reimbursement you should get a full breakdown of the figures.

    Interest rates have been good recently and were quite good before the crash but during those 20 years we have had many years when interest rates were practically nothing.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,836 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Have they actually said they’re not planning to add interest?
  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,704 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 April 2024 at 11:56AM
    Depends perhaps also on what your contract or terms agreed with them says.

    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,836 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
    Going bust shouldn't matter in relation to client monies (separate account, not for the firm's creditors to get at). In fact going bust might have brought it to somebody's attention a bit sooner


  • martindow
    martindow Posts: 10,568 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper


    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
    They have been financed over 20 years by the OP's money ... who knows what will happen when it's repaid.

  • theartfullodger
    theartfullodger Posts: 15,704 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    MEM62 said:
    martindow said:


    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
    They have been financed over 20 years by the OP's money ... who knows what will happen when it's repaid.

    No, they haven't.  The solicitor cannot use client funds for the running of their business.  Clients funds are held in a separate account as the money has to be ringfenced.  
    and there's never been an example of solicitors not abiding by the rules?  Aye, right, just like nobody ever drives faster than 70mph on UK roads...
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,836 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    MEM62 said:
    martindow said:


    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
    They have been financed over 20 years by the OP's money ... who knows what will happen when it's repaid.

    No, they haven't.  The solicitor cannot use client funds for the running of their business.  Clients funds are held in a separate account as the money has to be ringfenced.  
    and there's never been an example of solicitors not abiding by the rules?  Aye, right, just like nobody ever drives faster than 70mph on UK roads...
    They'd be less likely to go bust if they were helping themselves to client money...
  • MEM62
    MEM62 Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    MEM62 said:
    martindow said:


    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
    They have been financed over 20 years by the OP's money ... who knows what will happen when it's repaid.

    No, they haven't.  The solicitor cannot use client funds for the running of their business.  Clients funds are held in a separate account as the money has to be ringfenced.  
    and there's never been an example of solicitors not abiding by the rules?  
    Like all professions and organisations, there will be those in it that are more challenged in their moral standing than others.  No institution escapes that.    However, as there is a requirement for the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority to audit client accounts annually, the opportunity for them not abide by the rules in this particular area is somewhat restricted.         
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,836 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    MEM62 said:
    MEM62 said:
    martindow said:


    You are lucky they didn't go bust...
    They have been financed over 20 years by the OP's money ... who knows what will happen when it's repaid.

    No, they haven't.  The solicitor cannot use client funds for the running of their business.  Clients funds are held in a separate account as the money has to be ringfenced.  
    and there's never been an example of solicitors not abiding by the rules?  
    Like all professions and organisations, there will be those in it that are more challenged in their moral standing than others.  No institution escapes that.    However, as there is a requirement for the Solicitors' Regulatory Authority to audit client accounts annually, the opportunity for them not abide by the rules in this particular area is somewhat restricted.         
    Plus there’s a fund to compensate clients if they did lose money for such reasons.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.