We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Notice period different
TCPPC
Posts: 142 Forumite
I recently received a contract where the notice periods for employees and the employer differ. Following the probation period, I'm required to give a three-month notice, whereas the employer only needs to give me one week's notice for each year of service. This arrangement strikes me as somewhat unfair. Has anyone else encountered a similar situation? This is a public sector role, I have been working in private sector all my life so this is quite unusual for me. Everywhere i have been is match period
0
Comments
-
"Unfair" maybe but perfectly lawful and not uncommon.TCPPC said:I recently received a contract where the notice periods for employees and the employer differ. Following the probation period, I'm required to give a three-month notice, whereas the employer only needs to give me one week's notice for each year of service. This arrangement strikes me as somewhat unfair. Has anyone else encountered a similar situation? This is a public sector role, I have been working in private sector all my life so this is quite unusual for me.1 -
In no way am i saying its unlawful purely employment contract should be fair but hey if this is the typical public sector contract then what can i say.0
-
Not just in the public sector but also in the private sector with similar terms.0
-
You could argue that the law is unfair. If no notice period is specified in the contract then the legal default applies which is that an employee only has to give a week's notice regardless of their length of service. The employer on the other hand has to give one week for each year of service (up to a maximum of 12). Any contract term that tried to reduce this would be unlawful. Any contract term that required more notice would however be valid.TCPPC said:In no way am i saying its unlawful purely employment contract should be fair but hey if this is the typical public sector contract then what can i say.
0 -
To be fair, I have never come across this in the public sector and that's over 40 years of service. In my experience the norm is that notice periods are equal. I can't say that is the case everywhere, but as I said, in my experience that would not be typical.TCPPC said:In no way am i saying its unlawful purely employment contract should be fair but hey if this is the typical public sector contract then what can i say.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards