We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
Is there any point in spliting pensions between providers
Comments
-
If in drawdown, you might be covered against loss of funds, but you very likely would not be covered against loss of access to those funds....in other words, your assets might be ringfenced but your access to those assets is not.........and I'm not sure I'd rely on it being restored quickly in the event of serious issues (it might, but there's no guarantee).Albermarle said:But £120k in there so was just considering risks with the pot.....
If you are with a mainstream provider using regulated investments, then the chance of your pot vanishing into thin air is very minimal. Many people keep hundreds of thousands , even Millions , with one provider.
The risk is much more that you pick the wrong investments/the market plummets etc
That said, having multiple pensions will likely be more expensive, so each has to assess the relative risks for themselves.....1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards