BW Legal for PPM - Hearing August 2025

jd576

Letter sent as suggested and thread title updated

jd576

The letter about the trial bundle was sent both by Royal Mail and by email, since BW Legal has previously actively prevented my emails reaching them. 

In their trial bundle, they included a printout of my email containing my initial response to their letter of claim, proving that they receive these emails, or at least did receive them.

With respect to the email I just sent, I sent it to the email addresses listed on this email they included in the trial bundle, which includes their published disputeresolution@bwlegal.co.uk email address.

I received an undeliverable notice to all three emails. In this notice, it's 100% clear from the log messages copied into the undeliverable response that the reason my email was not delivered is because BW Legal have explicitly added my email address to a blocklist.

This is obstructionist and indicates that they simply wish to impose a burden by forcing all communications via snail mail.

At this stage of the game, with a hearing less than 14 days away, am I able to submit this undeliverable email as an addendum to my witness statement to demonstrate the degree to which this company acts in bad faith? Is it even worth doing so?

Coupon-mad

Did you try attaching your WS bundle to a reply to their email or did it come from 'NoReplyAt'?

jd576

Coupon-mad said:

Did you try attaching your WS bundle to a reply to their email or did it come from 'NoReplyAt'?

They've never emailed me. However, they did receive my email from last year, the initial response to their letter of claim, since they included a printout of this email in the trial bundle.

I submitted my WS by snail mail. That's done.

The email that bounced was the one telling the court that I do not agree to their trial bundle, since it is missing some evidence.

I sent this letter both by email and by Royal Mail. The BW Legal addresses all bounced - these are the same email addresses sent to in the email from me that they submitted in their own witness statement, all now blocked to me. 

I have proof of posting this letter, so that's not the issue.

It's just that this explicit blocking of the email address of someone they know they're pursuing is deliberately obstructionist. It's bully-boy tactics. Make-the-poor-sap-run-to-the-post-office-all-the-time schoolyard kind of bully boy stuff. And it shows them up to be far from reasonable. Hence why I asked if I could add an addendum to the WS, so the judge can see just how unreasonable their tactics are.

patient_dream

Your posts make interesting reading. 
I have seen these unreasonable antics from BWLEGAL .... 

First time, I was helping someone on here and joined him in court, He had asked BWL by enail about the fake £70 .... NO REPLY
He showed the judge the email and the judge asked the so called legal rep .. did he know about the email, he said NO 
As the claim included the £70 and BWL had failed to explain, the judge dismissed the claim and awarded £95 costs.

I helped another member on here with two claims from BWL totalling over £1300.
Again BWL ignored questions ... the judge was not impressed and called the parking companies a REGIME
Both cases were dismissed with costs awarded.

These legals who add fake amounts to claimsm should be investigated by the SRA and government especially what appears to be a cover up regarding VAT

Coupon-mad

jd576 said:

Coupon-mad said:

Did you try attaching your WS bundle to a reply to their email or did it come from 'NoReplyAt'?

They've never emailed me. However, they did receive my email from last year, the initial response to their letter of claim, since they included a printout of this email in the trial bundle.

I submitted my WS by snail mail. That's done.

The email that bounced was the one telling the court that I do not agree to their trial bundle, since it is missing some evidence.

I sent this letter both by email and by Royal Mail. The BW Legal addresses all bounced - these are the same email addresses sent to in the email from me that they submitted in their own witness statement, all now blocked to me. 

I have proof of posting this letter, so that's not the issue.

It's just that this explicit blocking of the email address of someone they know they're pursuing is deliberately obstructionist. It's bully-boy tactics. Make-the-poor-sap-run-to-the-post-office-all-the-time schoolyard kind of bully boy stuff. And it shows them up to be far from reasonable. Hence why I asked if I could add an addendum to the WS, so the judge can see just how unreasonable their tactics are.

I would raise that at the hearing when it comes to costs at the end. Paint it as part of a pattern of unreasonable conduct in this litigation.

I would not send addendum after addendum as the judge will not like it at all. You don't need this in a WS. You can just say it.

Le_Kirk

I used to recommend these email addresses but then the parking@ started failing.

parking@bwlegal.co.uk

customerinfo@bwlegal.co.uk

complaints@bwlegal.co.uk

disputeresolution@bwlegal.co.uk