We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Company holding payment in lieu of IT equipment
Comments
-
But the part of the letter you have quoted says they are very much interested in taking back the IT equipment and have told you where to send it. Why haven't you done so? With respect, this seems to be a problem of your own making.xyz111 said:they are not interested in taking back the IT equipment.
They are just not interested in paying up as IT equipment is cheaper than the monies they are holding.
this what they said within their letter:
Please can you arrange for all your equipment to be delivered back to the <city name> office location (address at the top of this letter). For now we will deduct the cost of the equipment from your final salary. I will seek a cost for this equipment and inform you of it in due course.2 -
Well i did say check the contract, you will get advice from me from my perspective. Generally how a forum that provides community feedback works.Exodi said:
To be clear, Dakta is not the OP, though they are clearly looking at it through the lens of a fully remote worker who may have never visited an office, or might be hundreds of miles from one. Despite fully remote workers making up 10% of the population, they have concluded their equipment return arrangements are likely the status quo.Hoenir said:
There's no reason for the courier cost not to be reimbursed. Perhaps it's your attitude that has resulted in your ex employer deciding to do nothing further. Presumably the balance is in their favour.Dakta said:
That said you shouldn't, unless contracted to, go out of your way to give the equipment back especially if at an expense.
As you say, if is acceptable for the goods to be posted, there are steps that can be taken to remove the obstacle. "Id make it clear the it equipment is available to be collected" just perpetuates the situation the OP is in: "At the moment you have a back and forth matter of 'we wont engage whilst you hold our equipment' which is not ideal, so break that deadlock and you can progress.".
Well who would have expected that? By the by, one day I asked everyone in my gym whether they consumed a protein shake at any point during the day, and was shocked to learn that most said they did. I think we can extrapolate this to the general public and conclude that drinking protein shakes is pretty much the norm.Dakta said:From conversations with my contracting friends, this seems pretty much the norm
Contractually speaking, I am a hybrid worker, and I live 30 miles from the office, but it wouldn't matter it it were 3, the process is the same - whatever lens you're looking at my post in, it's broken.
Friendly Tip: untwist those panties!
My advice to OP remains the same - solve the IT issue (but don't go to unnecessary expense) , then solve the money issue.
If you try and withhold the gear and solve the money issue, it will be complicated and won't be a good look if it escalates.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards