We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Mortgage broker error changing product led to taking mortgage with higher rate

Hi,

i just wanted some advise i went through a broker to get a first time buyer mortgage. I had it accepted and was fine but as the rates were lowering i changed the product with the same lender a few times. 

The last change the application wasnt submitted correctly. The broker company made it was the lender at fault but turns out it was them. Meaning i had to complete at a higher rate and the delay in getting a response or reply from them i could have even got a better rate at the time when i realised something wasnt right. 

As my solicitor then need to request the funds changing product wasnt an option then as cancelling takes 24 hours and then another 24 hours and then the completion deadline would have been missed. 

The broker has admitted fault now and offered compensation to cover what the difference for the rate that didnt go through and intially offered £100 compensation but then have offered £150. 
I think they should cover the rate i could have got when i had to go back to them to check it. 
I even raised the complaint with the lender initially as the broker was being slow. Thats when i found out it was the issue at the brokers side. 

Should i take the offer or go to the financial ombudsman to get the compensation which i think i deserve?

Has this happened to anyone and what did you do?

Comments

  • penners324
    penners324 Posts: 3,691 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The most you'll get is the difference in interest between the 2 rates plus the difference in product fee.

    Have you worked out how much that is?
  • ACG
    ACG Posts: 24,978 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    From a regulatory point of view, all they have to do is put you in the position you would have been. 
    Clearly its not possible for them to put you on the rate, so the alternative is to pay you the difference each month. If the difference is say £4 per month for 24 months, then that is what they have to do. 

    However, what they might do is offer you a lump sum which might be for the full amount or maybe not. If you go down the lump sum figure its just by agreement. 
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • The most you'll get is the difference in interest between the 2 rates plus the difference in product fee.

    Have you worked out how much that is?
    Yes i have, which they will pay in a lump some and the £150 compensation due to their error. This will then work out as the rate i should have got but not the rate at the time of finding the fault which i could have got if it wasnt for there delay. 

    I think i may go with the offer given as the one to go for the rate at the time of realising the fault could be a long shot. I just wanted to ask really. 

    Its a shame as it was a broker recommended by Martin too. I may not use them when it comes to the renewal due to the hassle and extra stress added by them. 
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,382 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Its a shame as it was a broker recommended by Martin too.
    He doesn't recommend any brokers.   There are a couple on this site but that is only because they have capacity.   Some of them don't have the greatest reputations.      Martin seems to like signposting to national firms but in reality, most smaller localised firms would give a better service and have greater experience than the factory line ones.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.