We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I think that it would be worth your while doing the SAR as above -it may indicate whether or not you were reinstated into SERPS.
Not unheard of for administrators to fail to pay over the necessary 'Contributions Equivalent Premium' to reinstate you...the SAR will confirm either way.
Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!
I think that it would be worth your while doing the SAR as above -it may indicate whether or not you were reinstated into SERPS.
Not unheard of for administrators to fail to pay over the necessary 'Contributions Equivalent Premium' to reinstate you...the SAR will confirm either way.
Or the payment of the CEP wasn't properly recorded.
Likely that Forte used a similar system to the LGPS. ie, instead of sending individual payments, our accts dept would sent a list of names, NI numbers, relevant dates and individual CEP amounts with a cheque for the total amount.
Any queries 20 or 30 odd years later would be met with a demand from COEG for details of at least 3 other people on the list, the total amount of the covering cheque, plus date it was cashed.........
