We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Child Accesses Mothers Pension After Her Death

Options
124

Comments

  • xylophone said:

    OP, is it possible that your late wife nominated the person to whom you refer as the recipient of the death grant?



    Thanks for your thorough reply. Yes, it is entirely possible that another party was nominated (a family member). If that is the case, would the pensions team share that information with me? For instance, would they let me know that they are acting on behalf of a third party?

    I received my portion of the pension recently, including a back payment, but I am still waiting for a reply from the draft letter.
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,138 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    xylophone said:

    OP, is it possible that your late wife nominated the person to whom you refer as the recipient of the death grant?



    Thanks for your thorough reply. Yes, it is entirely possible that another party was nominated (a family member). If that is the case, would the pensions team share that information with me? For instance, would they let me know that they are acting on behalf of a third party?

    I received my portion of the pension recently, including a back payment, but I am still waiting for a reply from the draft letter.
    If a nomination in favour of a. n. other predated your marriage, then it would be normal procedure for the trustees to overrule the nomination form in favour of the spouse/children.  
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If a nomination in favour of a. n. other predated your marriage, then it would be normal procedure for the trustees to overrule the nomination form in favour of the spouse/children.  

    The OP did say

    A person has come forward and informally claimed that they worked together with my wife such that that person would take full control of the pension. They claim to have taken the lump sum, and divided up the remainder between myself and my son. I don't consider the person to be reliable on numerous levels, and so I have my doubts.

    This does rather have the flavour of post marriage discussions between a person well known to the deceased (the family member to whom OP refers above)?

    Silvertabby would know how it works but in this scenario, the late spouse could have provided details of why she would prefer the relative to receive the death grant rather than her husband and child?

    I think that there must have been some misunderstanding about this person "taking full control" of the pension.

    The control of where to pay the pension and death grant would lie with the Trustees who themselves would be bound by the rules of the Scheme.

  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Apropos of the OP's question in his latest post, I seem to recall another relatively recent thread where it appeared that the adult offspring of a deceased person had not been nominated to receive death benefits they knew would be payable but could not obtain any details of the beneficiaries from the  Administrators because of data protection/privacy regulations.
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,138 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    xylophone said:
    If a nomination in favour of a. n. other predated your marriage, then it would be normal procedure for the trustees to overrule the nomination form in favour of the spouse/children.  

    The OP did say

    A person has come forward and informally claimed that they worked together with my wife such that that person would take full control of the pension. They claim to have taken the lump sum, and divided up the remainder between myself and my son. I don't consider the person to be reliable on numerous levels, and so I have my doubts.

    This does rather have the flavour of post marriage discussions between a person well known to the deceased (the family member to whom OP refers above)?

    Silvertabby would know how it works but in this scenario, the late spouse could have provided details of why she would prefer the relative to receive the death grant rather than her husband and child?

    I think that there must have been some misunderstanding about this person "taking full control" of the pension.

    The control of where to pay the pension and death grant would lie with the Trustees who themselves would be bound by the rules of the Scheme.

    Theoretically possible, but never known it to happen.  Can't think of any reason why OP's wife would have nominated someone other than her spouse and/or special needs child to receive a death benefit lump sum.

  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Theoretically possible, but never known it to happen.  Can't think of any reason why OP's wife would have nominated someone other than her spouse and/or special needs child to receive a death benefit lump sum.

    The phrase "worked with"....  I suppose one could imagine a degree of persuasion?

    A relative claiming to be "in need" or "would be there if little David  ever wanted anything and would have this little extra tucked away" or Mary dear, you know how much I did for you when........and only fair etc.....

    Perhaps I've been watching too many old films!

  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 14,433 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'm not sure speculation/discussion is helpful to the newly bereaved OP. Possibly wait until he posts again (if he wishes to do so) after receiving a full reply from the scheme?
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • ophone said:
    Theoretically possible, but never known it to happen.  Can't think of any reason why OP's wife would have nominated someone other than her spouse and/or special needs child to receive a death benefit lump sum.

    The phrase "worked with"....  I suppose one could imagine a degree of persuasion?

    A relative claiming to be "in need" or "would be there if little David  ever wanted anything and would have this little extra tucked away" or Mary dear, you know how much I did for you when........and only fair etc.....

    Perhaps I've been watching too many old films!

    Xylophone,  I  fully respect and admire the fantastic contributions  and help you provide on this forum. You are indeed a very helpful and knowledgeable poster. However in this case I don't think you can really speculate and wildly guess  any of the above scenarios,  particularly  with little or no family information forthcoming.  Regards

  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Point taken!

    Pure speculation on an imaginary scenario.
  • Neutrino22
    Neutrino22 Posts: 13 Forumite
    10 Posts
    edited 29 February 2024 at 7:44PM
    xylophone said:

    OP, is it possible that your late wife nominated the person to whom you refer as the recipient of the death grant?



    Thanks for your thorough reply. Yes, it is entirely possible that another party was nominated (a family member). If that is the case, would the pensions team share that information with me? For instance, would they let me know that they are acting on behalf of a third party?

    I received my portion of the pension recently, including a back payment, but I am still waiting for a reply from the draft letter.
    If a nomination in favour of a. n. other predated your marriage, then it would be normal procedure for the trustees to overrule the nomination form in favour of the spouse/children.  

    Ok. So I'll need to find the date that the nomination was made, before I had grounds to contest the nomination. Is that what you're saying here?

    And is a Nomination and a Beneficiary the same thing?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.