We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.

Advice on selling property or let to buy

Hello
We have a 2 bed mid terrace in Greater London and are looking to get a larger house for our family.

We have a few options and wanted advice on what would be best given our current mortgage / savings and circumstances.

Our home has another 18 months left on a 1.45% mortgage. We have 20 years left on our current term.

Our options are:

Sell property and buy larger house, accruing a larger mortgage debt and longer mortgage term
This feels like the most usual step when looking for a larger family home, however put off by the idea of having a larger mortgage.

Extend our current property
Thinking a loft and ground floor extension will give us much needed space but possibly not enough |(it's already a small house) and also aware of the disruption of a build, plus costs of approx. £100k.

Let to buy on our current property
We know least about this option but feel it could be profitable given the house is a great option for a rental and close to the central line but we are not experts in the field and concerned we may be under more financial strain if we went ahead. 
We've called our lender about this twice and got contradictory advice both times. 
while we know this is risky, we like the idea of keeping an asset for our future. 

If anyone has any thoughts or has been in a similar situation would be great to hear - 

- which option would be most financially savvy?
- with 2 children and full time jobs what would be the least taxing on our time / and savings?

thanks in advance.

Comments

  • Could you look to buy a larger house in a cheaper location - minimising the impact of option 1? I’d say the first option is least taxing on time, at least on an ongoing basis (obviously the one-off disruption of moving). Financially, it all depends - you’d need to compare likely house prices for the sort of place you’d want to buy v your current place v likely rental yields. Tax etc situation means letting can be high effort low reward - and presumably would mean taking on an even higher level of debt?
  • Where would you live if you let to buy it? You would be taking a huge mortgage on your new place and the additional 3% stamp duty.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.