We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Passive income

2»

Comments

  • NoMore
    NoMore Posts: 1,962 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
     My feeling is adding more lump sum money ( without the tax benefit ) is still useful because hopefully the fund (and the cost) will grow after a 10 year period before i draw on it.

    With no tax advantage without tax relief, your better just putting the extra money into an ISA.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,595 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Thumbs_Up said:

     you are allowed to put in 2880 which gets 720 tax relief added, making a total of 3600.
    It is legally permitted to pay in more than this, but you won't get any tax relief. So in 99% of cases it would be a bad idea. Many pension providers are not set up to deal with such excess contributions.

    This bit interest me, i have no salary wage income and contribute £2880 to my Vanguard SIPP. I did message Vanguard about me possibly adding more money to the pot, i can't remember the answer, but it was vague. My feeling is adding more lump sum money ( without the tax benefit ) is still useful because hopefully the fund (and the cost) will grow after a 10 year period before i draw on it.


    You normally put in £2880.  This is increased by HMRC to £3500.  I(f you have other income greater than your tax alowance you could be paying tax on the £3500 when you withdraw it still making a small tax gain on the £2880 because of the 25% tax free,

    But if you have no earnings and pay more into a pension than the £2880 you dont get the tax relief but you could get taxed when you withdraw and so make a tax loss on the deal.  In these circumstances you would be better off putting the money into an ISA.

  • michaels said:

    a) you expected to withdraw them without paying tax (ie your total income during drawdown would be less than the personal tax allowance) and
    b) You had filled your isa allowance and/or
    3) The reduction in income assessed for certain benefits gave you an entitlement that you would not otherwise have

    4d) You were trying to protect the money from IHT (might or might not work)
    5e) Your contributions were matched by an employer, and you didn't want to miss out on the free money
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.