We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is the State Pension a benefit?
RG2015
Posts: 6,126 Forumite
There was an article in the i over the weekend saying the following.
I did catch my eye and it does appear controversial but does it matter?
I was though wondering what others on here thought.
I did notice that the journalist looked about 12 years old from his photograph!
https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/money/pensions-and-retirement/state-pension-benefit-2788014
The state pension is a benefit – here’s why it’s important we say so
The notion that people collecting their state pension are simply taking back what they previously paid in is wrong
I did catch my eye and it does appear controversial but does it matter?
I was though wondering what others on here thought.
I did notice that the journalist looked about 12 years old from his photograph!
https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/money/pensions-and-retirement/state-pension-benefit-2788014
0
Comments
-
Seems like a pointless article to meIt's just my opinion and not advice.5
-
Don't really care if it's called a Benefit, Earnings or a gift from the Magic Money Elf.
There is a real point in the article about attitudes towards people who receive state benefits and not wanting state pensions to be seen in the same way.
Full-on prejudice is what I'd call it. It's a benefit, get over it.6 -
Same as child benefit, which despite being called a benefit is also not viewed in the same way.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2 -
Yes, I hadn't thought of that.elsien said:Same as child benefit, which despite being called a benefit is also a not viewed in the same way.
In fact it's a double benefit as my wife received 18 years of NI contributions without being in paid employment, which in turn fed her state pension qualification years0 -
In the 1960s there were people of pension age without sufficient contributions to gain a retirement pension, who flatly refused to accept National Assistance as it was known then, because it was a means tested benefit.I doubt if there would be many thinking similarly today!"A week is a long time in politics." Harold Wilson1
-
I have just read the wording of the 2015 petition and the government response. The response actually included the words; "No offence is intended by the use of this term"flaneurs_lobster said:Don't really care if it's called a Benefit, Earnings or a gift from the Magic Money Elf.
There is a real point in the article about attitudes towards people who receive state benefits and not wanting state pensions to be seen in the same way.
Full-on prejudice is what I'd call it. It's a benefit, get over it.
I think your key words of attitudes and prejudice are spot on.
Polarised opinion fed by all forms of media just permeate every corner of society these days.
https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/121267#:~:text=The State Pension is described,in the National Insurance Fund.
1 -
No it’s the same today 850,000 don’t claim Pension Credit about one third of those eligible.Dustyevsky said:In the 1960s there were people of pension age without sufficient contributions to gain a retirement pension, who flatly refused to accept National Assistance as it was known then, because it was a means tested benefit.I doubt if there would be many thinking similarly today!2 -
The issue, I presume, is the fairly pejorative nature that many people seem to attach to the the term 'benefits'.
That is compounded further by the NI-qualifying years which means that many people take the view that the State Pension is theirs by virtue of having 'paid for it'. Whilst inaccurate, given the (new) system of '35 qualifying years given you a full pension' does pretty strongly indicate that, especially to those less au fait with the benefit/tax/fiscal system. I don't blame anyone for misunderstanding it.
In short, it is a 'benefit' and anyone taking umbrage with the term, probably needs some self-reflection.3 -
How easy is it to claim?MX5huggy said:
No it’s the same today 850,000 don’t claim Pension Credit about one third of those eligible.Dustyevsky said:In the 1960s there were people of pension age without sufficient contributions to gain a retirement pension, who flatly refused to accept National Assistance as it was known then, because it was a means tested benefit.I doubt if there would be many thinking similarly today!0 -
Have a go at the eligibility check and see for yourselfwestv said:
How easy is it to claim?MX5huggy said:
No it’s the same today 850,000 don’t claim Pension Credit about one third of those eligible.Dustyevsky said:In the 1960s there were people of pension age without sufficient contributions to gain a retirement pension, who flatly refused to accept National Assistance as it was known then, because it was a means tested benefit.I doubt if there would be many thinking similarly today!
https://www.gov.uk/pension-credit-calculator
I wouldn't say it was easy nor difficult. What it is is detailed and involved, as you would expect for any eligibility check for benefit.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


