📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

First Time DIY Portfolio

Options
1567810

Comments

  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,240 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The lesson for investors - sock picking would not be any easier, even if we knew the future.’

    If I have 3 pairs of UK socks and 3 pairs of US socks in a bag, how many will I have to pick out to be sure of a matching pair......? (Sorry :D )

  • JohnWinder
    JohnWinder Posts: 1,862 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Very well with many multi-asset portfolio/funds with underlying passives.    e.g. HSBC GS vs VLS.
    Fair enough. We should look at the methods Morningstar used for their analysis; it might be a flawed study. But we should also quantify how well ‘very well’ is for the GS-types compared to a two fund portfolio we might hold, although they don’t have a very long representative (of time) history.
  • Qyburn
    Qyburn Posts: 3,619 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    LHW99 said:

    If I have 3 pairs of UK socks and 3 pairs of US socks in a bag, how many will I have to pick out to be sure of a matching pair......? (Sorry :D )

    Are the right and left different?
  • MK62
    MK62 Posts: 1,741 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You might also need to drill down on the "this outperforms that 80% of the time"......it might but the level of that outperformance also needs to be quantified.......ie if fund A makes 4% a year for 5 years, and fund B makes 3% a year for 4 years, and 10% one year, then fund A has indeed outperformed fund B 80% of the time, but a fund A investor would still end up with less money than a fund B investor, assuming they invested the same amount on the same day.
  • coastline
    coastline Posts: 1,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Although the OP hasn't indicated placing the pension into ETF's it's worth reading about FSCS investment protection. This forum is split in opinion about ETF's and some won't buy them . I hold them at times but only the main ETF's UK domiciled and with large market capitalisation. Eg..VWRL, ISF etc where funds have billions in them.
    Article is decent and reading the comments I came across a post about the IE platform. Scroll down near the bottom to post 53 by S M dated March 13th, 2023 ,8.29pm. Perhaps other posters can add to this ?

    FSCS investment protection: are you covered by the investor compensation scheme? - Monevator
  • coastline
    coastline Posts: 1,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 11 November 2023 at 6:35PM

    ‘buying and holding, come what may, still generated better returns over the past 21 years, albeit by a narrow margin of around 0.76% per year.’ https://www.morningstar.com/portfolios/staying-invested-beats-timing-marketheres-proof 

    The idea holding cash when markets are so called overvalued doesn't pay off at all. Markets can stay overvalued for years and SP 500 is a perfect example. There's only been a few genuine cases in history where the P/E ratio was way too high. The last one was the dotcom boom where every share in the world became overbought. UK shares were over P/E 20 and never heard of. The recent pandemic crash sent valuations high due to one off hits to companies but they recovered. So how do you value the market ? If you decided P/E near 20 was too high you'd never have been invested in the US last 30 years.

    Unknown.png (613×328) (ritholtz.com)

    S&P 500 PE Ratio - How the Price Earnings Ratio Helps You to Valuate the Companies in the Standard and Poor 500 - UndervaluedEquity.com

    EZ_91bOXQAAp1Zo (1400×1169) (twimg.com)

    When FED rates are high P/E's tend to be low and nearer 10. Recently P/E's have been high which has discouraged some from investing in the US.  Wil it pay off ?

    F9Mw2ZhWEAACG-C (900×501) (twimg.com)

    Here's a chart I bookmarked recently showing a 6% FED rate which keeps the lid on equities . 100 years of data so if inflation doesn't fall then the markets mightn't hold up.

    EybIWfVW8AMazW4 (680×470) (twimg.com)


  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,707 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    coastline said:
    Although the OP hasn't indicated placing the pension into ETF's it's worth reading about FSCS investment protection. This forum is split in opinion about ETF's and some won't buy them . I hold them at times but only the main ETF's UK domiciled and with large market capitalisation. Eg..VWRL, ISF etc where funds have billions in them.
    Article is decent and reading the comments I came across a post about the IE platform. Scroll down near the bottom to post 53 by S M dated March 13th, 2023 ,8.29pm. Perhaps other posters can add to this ?

    FSCS investment protection: are you covered by the investor compensation scheme? - Monevator
    Whilst the risk is low if you know what you are doing, it is worth noting that PI insurers increase their premiums to IFAs if ETFs are used in the recommendations because they are considered higher risk relative to the OEIC/UT.    That may be more regulatory risk as the FOS is a bit nanny state in that respect.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • RichardS
    RichardS Posts: 177 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    coastline said:
    Although the OP hasn't indicated placing the pension into ETF's it's worth reading about FSCS investment protection. This forum is split in opinion about ETF's and some won't buy them . I hold them at times but only the main ETF's UK domiciled and with large market capitalisation. Eg..VWRL, ISF etc where funds have billions in them.
    Article is decent and reading the comments I came across a post about the IE platform. Scroll down near the bottom to post 53 by S M dated March 13th, 2023 ,8.29pm. Perhaps other posters can add to this ?

    FSCS investment protection: are you covered by the investor compensation scheme? - Monevator
    Thanks for this. There’s a lot to read in there and lots of things I do not understand. I saw the response from IE - comment 72 I think but that didn’t help me much either. So what’s the bottom line - where can I passively invest and be 100% covered (let’s say I have a £26k ISA and a £200k pension). Which types of funds and which platforms? Would I have to stay away from ETFs all together or if not how do I know which ones are safest?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,707 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    RichardS said:
    coastline said:
    Although the OP hasn't indicated placing the pension into ETF's it's worth reading about FSCS investment protection. This forum is split in opinion about ETF's and some won't buy them . I hold them at times but only the main ETF's UK domiciled and with large market capitalisation. Eg..VWRL, ISF etc where funds have billions in them.
    Article is decent and reading the comments I came across a post about the IE platform. Scroll down near the bottom to post 53 by S M dated March 13th, 2023 ,8.29pm. Perhaps other posters can add to this ?

    FSCS investment protection: are you covered by the investor compensation scheme? - Monevator
    Thanks for this. There’s a lot to read in there and lots of things I do not understand. I saw the response from IE - comment 72 I think but that didn’t help me much either. So what’s the bottom line - where can I passively invest and be 100% covered (let’s say I have a £26k ISA and a £200k pension). Which types of funds and which platforms? Would I have to stay away from ETFs all together or if not how do I know which ones are safest?
    Either stick to pension funds (which have 100% FSCS protection with no upper limit) or use UT/OEIC funds which have £85k per fund house (not per fund).

    Would I have to stay away from ETFs all together or if not how do I know which ones are safest?
    Its a risk based decision that only you can make.     Thankfully, since 2013 when unbundling occurred, the difference between OEICs/UTs and ETFs in terms of pricing is minimal.  Indeed, in some cases the OEIC/UT is cheaper and in many cases, it is virtually the same.  



    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • noclaf
    noclaf Posts: 977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    dunstonh said:
    RichardS said:
    coastline said:
    Although the OP hasn't indicated placing the pension into ETF's it's worth reading about FSCS investment protection. This forum is split in opinion about ETF's and some won't buy them . I hold them at times but only the main ETF's UK domiciled and with large market capitalisation. Eg..VWRL, ISF etc where funds have billions in them.
    Article is decent and reading the comments I came across a post about the IE platform. Scroll down near the bottom to post 53 by S M dated March 13th, 2023 ,8.29pm. Perhaps other posters can add to this ?

    FSCS investment protection: are you covered by the investor compensation scheme? - Monevator
    Thanks for this. There’s a lot to read in there and lots of things I do not understand. I saw the response from IE - comment 72 I think but that didn’t help me much either. So what’s the bottom line - where can I passively invest and be 100% covered (let’s say I have a £26k ISA and a £200k pension). Which types of funds and which platforms? Would I have to stay away from ETFs all together or if not how do I know which ones are safest?
    Either stick to pension funds (which have 100% FSCS protection with no upper limit) or use UT/OEIC funds which have £85k per fund house (not per fund).

    Would I have to stay away from ETFs all together or if not how do I know which ones are safest?
    Its a risk based decision that only you can make.     Thankfully, since 2013 when unbundling occurred, the difference between OEICs/UTs and ETFs in terms of pricing is minimal.  Indeed, in some cases the OEIC/UT is cheaper and in many cases, it is virtually the same.  



    If using big ETF's from the established firms (Vanguard, HSBC, BlackRock, State Street to name a couple that I currently invest in) realistically how significant is the risk?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.