We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Another LGPS pension transfer question - historic
Comments
-
Never part time.Silvertabby said:
Or was part time, and didn't opt in?xylophone said:Annoyingly she has retained payslips prior to 1996 but none after that and no pension paperwork at all. I'm surprised because she normally retains most paperwork.And none of them show pension contributions?
It seems significant that up to 1996 no pension contributions are shown but the LA record shows membership from 1997.
Is it possible that she opted out of joining in 1990 but opted in in 1997?
See
https://democracy.npt.gov.uk/Data/Personnel Committee/20031002/Agenda/$PERS-021003-REP-HS-U.doc.pdf
-
From April 1990
-
The one year qualifying period for manual workers was removed
-
All eligible employees automatically brought into scheme but part timers still
had to elect to join
-
Anyone could opt-out
-
No recollection of opting out of the pension and I think it's very unlikely that she would have done that.
However I see no sign of any pension contributions on the pre-97 payslips.0 -
-
What did her previous annual benefit statements show? If she transferred in 2003, then there should have been one for every year from 2005 to the present. If not actual dates, I would expect an account of reckonable service in years and days broken down (from 2009) by accrual type (the figure for 80ths or pre-April 2008 pension would be the relevant one for the present issue).leosayer said:
Never part time.Silvertabby said:
Or was part time, and didn't opt in?xylophone said:Annoyingly she has retained payslips prior to 1996 but none after that and no pension paperwork at all. I'm surprised because she normally retains most paperwork.And none of them show pension contributions?
It seems significant that up to 1996 no pension contributions are shown but the LA record shows membership from 1997.
Is it possible that she opted out of joining in 1990 but opted in in 1997?
See
https://democracy.npt.gov.uk/Data/Personnel Committee/20031002/Agenda/$PERS-021003-REP-HS-U.doc.pdf
-
From April 1990
-
The one year qualifying period for manual workers was removed
-
All eligible employees automatically brought into scheme but part timers still
had to elect to join
-
Anyone could opt-out
-
No recollection of opting out of the pension and I think it's very unlikely that she would have done that.
However I see no sign of any pension contributions on the pre-97 payslips.0 -
-
Try the SAR route as in my previous post?0
-
Some further historic paperwork has materialised from the bowls of our kitchen cupboard generating some spousal tension.
Within this bundle is a pension choice election form that my wife signed in April 1997.
The heading reads "Having commenced employment with an admitted body, you may elect to join the Local Government Pension Scheme, administered by the City of Westminster.".
The form has space for 'Date Commenced Employment' which my wife has completed with November 1990. Other documentation (including subsequent LGPS statement from 1997) confirm the date of admission to the pension as 1997.
So the source of the 1997 date is now clear. Not sure a SAR will be of help now.
It's not clear what gave rise to the completion of the form, whether:
1. My wife had opted out of the pension when she commenced employment in 1990 - and then opted in in 1997 or
2. There was no pension available from 1990 to 1997 or
3. She had a different pension or employment arrangement in place from 1990 to 1997 or
4. Something else we're missing
Thanks to all who have given help so far. I feel we might be at the end of the road now but any more pointers gratefully received.
1 -
leosayer said:Some further historic paperwork has materialised from the bowls of our kitchen cupboard generating some spousal tension.I hate it when that happens!Good luck, I hope you can sort everything out.N. Hampshire, he/him. Octopus Intelligent Go elec & Tracker gas / Vodafone BB / iD mobile. Ripple Kirk Hill Coop member.Ofgem cap table, Ofgem cap explainer. Economy 7 cap explainer. Gas vs E7 vs peak elec heating costs, Best kettle!
2.72kWp PV facing SSW installed Jan 2012. 11 x 247w panels, 3.6kw inverter. 34 MWh generated, long-term average 2.6 Os.1 -
Some further historic paperwork has materialised from the bowls of our kitchen cupboard
Sounds less grisly (and more plausible) than bowels... :)
Within this bundle is a pension choice election form that my wife signed in April 1997.
The heading reads "Having commenced employment with an admitted body, you may elect to join the Local Government Pension Scheme, administered by the City of Westminster.".She had commenced employment with Housing Corporation in 1990. Why should she suddenly have received this communication in 1997?
I still think that it is worth trying the SAR route just to check .
Looking at your wife's pre 1997 pay slips, what is the letter shown on the NI line? D? N? A? Something else?
0 -
I suppose it is possible that HC only became an "admitted body" in 1997?
If it wasn't an admitted body, it seems unlikely that there was no pension scheme in place in an NDPS - it would seem likely that any such pension would have been a defined benefit contracted out scheme and could possibly have been non- contributory.
Or if it was an admitted body when your wife commenced employment in 1990, your wife was in a category of staff (pre April joiner?) having to elect to join the scheme (and she didn't so elect)?
0 -
Good question. I can't find any material that states the reason behind the communication.xylophone said:Some further historic paperwork has materialised from the bowls of our kitchen cupboardSounds less grisly (and more plausible) than bowels... :)
Within this bundle is a pension choice election form that my wife signed in April 1997.
The heading reads "Having commenced employment with an admitted body, you may elect to join the Local Government Pension Scheme, administered by the City of Westminster.".She had commenced employment with Housing Corporation in 1990. Why should she suddenly have received this communication in 1997?
I still think that it is worth trying the SAR route just to check .
Looking at your wife's pre 1997 pay slips, what is the letter shown on the NI line? D? N? A? Something else?
The NI letter on the payslips from the pre-1997 period is 'A'.
There is also a deduction for 'MSF' of £6.37 per month - I assume this is union membership, it's too small for anything else.
I'll discuss the SAR with my wife. This would only be for LGPS though so I assume it will be a long shot that we'll discover anything from before the 1997 change.0 -
NI code A means that your wife paid full rate NI. If she had been a member of a contracted out DB scheme, then her code would have been D.leosayer said:
Good question. I can't find any material that states the reason behind the communication.xylophone said:Some further historic paperwork has materialised from the bowls of our kitchen cupboardSounds less grisly (and more plausible) than bowels... :)
Within this bundle is a pension choice election form that my wife signed in April 1997.
The heading reads "Having commenced employment with an admitted body, you may elect to join the Local Government Pension Scheme, administered by the City of Westminster.".She had commenced employment with Housing Corporation in 1990. Why should she suddenly have received this communication in 1997?
I still think that it is worth trying the SAR route just to check .
Looking at your wife's pre 1997 pay slips, what is the letter shown on the NI line? D? N? A? Something else?
The NI letter on the payslips from the pre-1997 period is 'A'.
There is also a deduction for 'MSF' of £6.37 per month - I assume this is union membership, it's too small for anything else.
I'll discuss the SAR with my wife. This would only be for LGPS though so I assume it will be a long shot that we'll discover anything from before the 1997 change.
It's looking more and more likely she wasn't a member of the pension scheme before 1997, so the only question now is 'why'. If your wife is 100% sure that she didn't originally opt out, then you may wish to push for employer error - but it won't be easy to prove and, even if successful, she would still have to pay her 7 years worth of contributions.
MSF was almost certainly her Union subscription.0 -
So contracted in, and therefore likely not a member of an occupational pension scheme at that point (certainly not the LGPS or another public sector scheme, which were only ever contracted out)...leosayer said:The NI letter on the payslips from the pre-1997 period is 'A'.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

